Skip to content

Conversation

@cjschaef
Copy link
Member

Move off the dedicated storage machine profile, as it has shown to
be less reliable for provisioning on IBM Cloud.

Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045916

Move off the dedicated storage machine profile, as it has shown to
be less reliable for provisioning on IBM Cloud.

Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045916
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jan 25, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 25, 2022

@cjschaef: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2045916, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2045916: IBMCloud: Stop defaulting to dedicated storage profile

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jan 25, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jhixson74 and kirankt January 25, 2022 23:12
@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/approve

@jstuever jstuever self-assigned this Jan 26, 2022
@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jan 26, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 26, 2022

@jstuever: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2045916, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (gpei@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 26, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 26, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jstuever

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 26, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

14 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws
Not sure why tide is still waiting on a test that already passed.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

/skip

@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@pamoedom
Copy link
Contributor

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Jan 28, 2022
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2022

@patrickdillon: Overrode contexts on behalf of patrickdillon: ci/prow/e2e-aws

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

overriding because this pr has nothing to do with aws, test is flaking and and this pr already passed the test once

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f9d8a2d into openshift:master Jan 28, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2022

@cjschaef: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2045916 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2045916: IBMCloud: Stop defaulting to dedicated storage profile

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 28, 2022

@cjschaef: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-ibmcloud eaa2c12 link false /test e2e-ibmcloud
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node eaa2c12 link false /test e2e-aws-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-crc eaa2c12 link false /test e2e-crc
ci/prow/e2e-aws-workers-rhel8 eaa2c12 link false /test e2e-aws-workers-rhel8
ci/prow/e2e-alibaba eaa2c12 link false /test e2e-alibaba
ci/prow/e2e-azure-upi eaa2c12 link false /test e2e-azure-upi
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade eaa2c12 link false /test okd-e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-workers-rhel7 eaa2c12 link false /test e2e-aws-workers-rhel7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@cjschaef cjschaef deleted the bz_2045916 branch January 28, 2022 19:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants