-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Bug 2008823: baremetal: Ensure ipv6 bootstrap VM client-id is predictable #5250
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2008823: baremetal: Ensure ipv6 bootstrap VM client-id is predictable #5250
Conversation
In openshift#4052 we added interfaces to control the MAC addresses for the NICs in the bootstrap VM, so that in environments where DHCP pools are not allowed, a static reservation can be made. Unfortunately that doesn't work in ipv6 environments currently, because NetworkManager needs a specific configuration similar to that applied via the MCO[1] for cluster hosts to ensure the generated client-ID is derived from the MAC and predictable. [1] https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/blob/master/templates/common/on-prem/files/NetworkManager-onprem.conf.yaml
These control the MAC for the bootstrap VM NICs, not the bridges on the host where the VM is running.
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered cloning bug for cherrypick for bug 1972524 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details. Full error message.
code 53: Bugzilla_api_key is not a valid parameter for the Bugzilla::Bug::create function.
Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retitle Bug 2008823: baremetal: Ensure ipv6 bootstrap VM client-id is predictable |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2008823, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/bugzilla refresh |
|
@hardys: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2008823, which is valid. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla ([email protected]), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/label platform/baremetal |
kirankt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve
|
/lgtm |
|
/assign @patrickdillon - could you take a look and approve please? (we've not backported the addition of @kirankt to the 4.8 baremetal-approvers yet) |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: kirankt, staebler The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
4 similar comments
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
4 similar comments
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
2 similar comments
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 2008823 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #5110
/assign hardys