Skip to content

Conversation

@jiajliu
Copy link
Contributor

@jiajliu jiajliu commented Aug 19, 2021

# ./oc get clusterversion
NAME      VERSION                             AVAILABLE   PROGRESSING   SINCE   STATUS
version   4.9.0-0.nightly-2021-08-18-144658   True        False         157m    Cluster version is 4.9.0-0.nightly-2021-08-18-144658

# ./oc get clusterversion -ojson|jq .items[].spec
{
  "channel": "stable-4.8",
  "clusterID": "a26e6104-d182-488e-b261-d785e5caf424"
}

The default channel should be stable-4.9.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jhixson74 and rna-afk August 19, 2021 04:19
@jiajliu
Copy link
Contributor Author

jiajliu commented Aug 19, 2021

cc @wking

@jiajliu
Copy link
Contributor Author

jiajliu commented Aug 19, 2021

/assign @wking

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@jiajliu: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-fips 2fb69e2 link /test e2e-aws-fips
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node 2fb69e2 link /test e2e-aws-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-aws-workers-rhel7 2fb69e2 link /test e2e-aws-workers-rhel7
ci/prow/e2e-crc 2fb69e2 link /test e2e-crc

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Member

@wking wking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Previously (e.g. for the 4.8 bump in #4868), we have linked these to bugs (e.g. rhbz#1952632) when they landed after feature freeze. I'll clone that bug forward and link it here, so we don't have to waive process.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 19, 2021
@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Aug 19, 2021

/retitle Bug 1995655: bump default channel to stable-4.9
/retest-required

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title bump default channel to stable-4.9 Bug 1995655: bump default channel to stable-4.9 Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@jiajliu: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1995655, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla ([email protected]), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1995655: bump default channel to stable-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 19, 2021
@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Aug 19, 2021

We clear the channel in CI (openshift/release#8631), so no need to wait out the update retest:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@wking: Overrode contexts on behalf of wking: ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

Details

In response to this:

We clear the channel in CI (openshift/release#8631), so no need to wait out the update retest:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c0c1a20 into openshift:master Aug 19, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 19, 2021

@jiajliu: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1995655 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1995655: bump default channel to stable-4.9

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

wking added a commit to wking/openshift-installer that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2021
Like 2fb69e2 (bump default channel to stable-4.9, 2021-08-19, openshift#5159),
d148108 (data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Bump default to
stable-4.8, 2021-04-03, openshift#4868), and earlier.
clnperez pushed a commit to clnperez/installer that referenced this pull request Nov 2, 2021
Like 2fb69e2 (bump default channel to stable-4.9, 2021-08-19, openshift#5159),
d148108 (data/manifests/bootkube/cvo-overrides: Bump default to
stable-4.8, 2021-04-03, openshift#4868), and earlier.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-low Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is low for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants