-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Bug 1871795: bump RHCOS images to fix SSH authentication #4095
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@bgilbert: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1871795, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/assign @sdodson |
|
/test e2e-gcp |
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
/approve |
|
/retest |
2 similar comments
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
In prior bootimage bumps we've had a rough rule of requiring aws/gcp/azure, best effort debugging vsphere, metal and others. You can usually take other ones as e2e-aws-workers-rhel7 as totally optional. A good rule is to look at the latest periodics, e.g. the last currently accepted release image for 4.6 had e2e-metal passing, so we know that is working. |
|
The current e2e-aws failure looks like some sort of test infrastructure failure. |
|
/retest |
|
Hm, not clear to me what's going on here - e2e-aws for example seems good on other repositories. I don't see anything in recently merged openshift/release PRs that look relevant. |
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
/approve |
|
/approve |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, cgwalters, sdodson The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
Blah, azure is hitting rate limits. |
|
It'd be good to get this to pass, even though it's very unlikely we somehow broke just Azure in this. |
|
@bgilbert: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Ugh looks like something fell over in...one of the centos7 repos? Oh wait I think I see...this is fallout from the switch to ubi8 probably. |
|
Took a stab at fixing this in #4106 |
|
@bgilbert: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1871795 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Just like openshift#4095 but for multi-arch
Just like openshift#4095 but for multi-arch
No description provided.