-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Bug 1824991: Update vSphere and Metal UPI for terraform 0.12 #3497
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 1824991: Update vSphere and Metal UPI for terraform 0.12 #3497
Conversation
- Update to terraform 0.12.x - ipam moved to a module and updated for 0.12 - creation of vsphere objects moved to module - removal of etcd dns records - domain dns records separated from creating rhcos node a records - create load balancer using openshift haproxy image and an additional rhcos virtual machine - create dns A record for lb ip and api, api-int, *.apps - change virtual machine ignition extra config to file path string vs ignition string. Simplifies bootstrap and other instance configuration - Updated Dockerfile CI UPI image for 0.12.24
|
@jcpowermac: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824991, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/test e2e-vsphere-upi |
1 similar comment
|
/test e2e-vsphere-upi |
|
/test e2e-vsphere |
|
Not enough resources |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/bugzilla refresh Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. |
|
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824991, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
10 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/bugzilla refresh Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed. |
|
@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824991, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@varungur is there something that needs to be done with this PR to make sure metal is not broken once this is approved? |
|
Can you pick a7ca3ff into this? |
|
/lgtm |
|
/test e2e-metal |
|
/test e2e-vsphere |
|
/test e2e-vsphere-upi |
|
@jcpowermac: The specified target(s) for
Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/test e2e-vsphere |
|
Will |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
3 similar comments
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@jcpowermac: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/retitle Bug 1824991: Update vSphere and Metal UPI for terraform 0.12 |
|
@jcpowermac: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/installer#3497. Bugzilla bug 1824991 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Cherry-pick: #3429