-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
data/aws/vpc: Drop new_az_count and vpc_id locals #2437
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
openshift-merge-robot
merged 1 commit into
openshift:master
from
wking:aws-drop-new_az_count
Oct 2, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
using the data in all the clients, ties the clients to how vpc information is fetched.
using resource -> data source makes CREATE, READ, READ api calls which isn't bad but tying our clients to data source to get the vpc id means we can't change those transparently to all the clients.
So i do prefer the local.vpc_id approach.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We're already doing that, aren't we? And we're already consuming it here and in other places in master.
We can change this transparently by adjusting what we feed into the
datablock (like this). The consumers just look atdata.aws_vpc.cluster_vpcand don't have to care about whether this is a new or preexisting VPC.So I don't see any functional difference between
local.vpc_idanddata.aws_vpc.cluster_vpc.idbesides the latter being slightly slower due to the latency of the fetch we need to run anyway. And I think adding that latency for consumers that need only the VPC ID is a small price to pay for the benefit of reducing the number of moving parts. Am I missing something? Or do you just think that it's worth having local variables to save the latency when the VPC ID is the only thing we care about?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it's not super important and we can reconsider if it does later on.