Skip to content

Conversation

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

@stbenjam stbenjam commented Jul 9, 2019

This is broken out from #1873. See individual commits for details, but some of the configuration on the bootstrap node should only be enabled for the baremetal platform, so we move these to data/data/bootstrap/baremetal and adjust the code to conditionally read this depending on the platform name.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 9, 2019
@stbenjam stbenjam changed the title bootstrap: add platform-specific configuration for bootstrap [WIP] bootstrap: add platform-specific configuration for bootstrap Jul 9, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 9, 2019
@russellb russellb added the platform/baremetal IPI bare metal hosts platform label Jul 9, 2019
stbenjam and others added 2 commits July 10, 2019 09:14
This commit allows per-platform ignition configuration to be defined.
These files should be placed in data/data/bootstrap/<platform>/.

Co-authored-by: Steven Hardy <[email protected]>
The baremetal platform (IPI for Bare Metal hosts) includes some
additional assets on the bootstrap node for automating some
infrastructure requirements that would have normally been handled by
some cloud infrastructure service. See
data/data/bootstrap/baremetal/README.md for more detailed documentation.

Co-authored-by: Ben Nemec <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Mark McLoughlin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Russell Bryant <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Stephen Benjamin <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Steven Hardy <[email protected]>
@stbenjam stbenjam changed the title [WIP] bootstrap: add platform-specific configuration for bootstrap bootstrap: add platform-specific configuration for bootstrap Jul 10, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 10, 2019
@stbenjam stbenjam changed the title bootstrap: add platform-specific configuration for bootstrap bootstrap: add platform-specific configuration for baremetal Jul 10, 2019
@stbenjam
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @abhinavdahiya

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member Author

@abhinavdahiya This now includes much improved documentation. There are still some gaps to address, which we could do in this PR, or as a follow-up, depending on your preference.

Thanks!

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Had some nits and questions but those are not blocking and can be done as follow-up

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 10, 2019
@stbenjam
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@stbenjam stbenjam mentioned this pull request Jul 10, 2019
2 tasks
@stbenjam
Copy link
Member Author

Is this PR good to go and we can address the points in the discussion here in follow-ups? Looks like tide is waiting on a lgtm.

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

I approved it to give you guys some time to respond if the fix requests will be done in this pr or follow-up... looks like latter

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 11, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, stbenjam

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@stbenjam
Copy link
Member Author

/test e2e-aws

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 95f894a into openshift:master Jul 12, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@stbenjam: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7 90d7a15 link /test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@stbenjam stbenjam deleted the bootstrap branch July 12, 2019 12:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. platform/baremetal IPI bare metal hosts platform size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.