Skip to content

Conversation

@wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Jan 5, 2019

DO NOT MERGE!

That's almost the latest RHCOS release:

$ curl -s https://releases-rhcos.svc.ci.openshift.org/storage/releases/maipo/builds.json | jq '{latest: .builds[0], timestamp}'
{
  "latest": "47.246",
  "timestamp": "2019-01-05T23:11:19Z"
}

I'm going with 47.245, because it's been selected as the likely build for the next OpenShift release.

@smarterclayton just pushed 4.0.0-0.alpha-2019-01-04-235315 to quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.0.0-9.

Renaming OPENSHIFT_INSTALL_RELEASE_IMAGE_OVERRIDE gets us CI testing of the pinned release despite openshift/release@60007df2 (openshift/release#1793).

Also comment out regions which this particular RHCOS build wasn't pushed to (like #997), leaving only:

$ curl -s https://releases-rhcos.svc.ci.openshift.org/storage/releases/maipo/47.246/meta.json | jq -r '.amis[] | .name'
ap-northeast-1
ap-northeast-2
ap-south-1
ap-southeast-1
ap-southeast-2
ca-central-1
eu-central-1
eu-west-1
eu-west-2
eu-west-3
sa-east-1
us-east-1
us-east-2
us-west-1
us-west-2

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 5, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 5, 2019
@wking wking force-pushed the version-0.9.0-pins branch from eb42169 to a019730 Compare January 5, 2019 23:20
…-release:4.0.0-9

That's almost the latest RHCOS release:

  $ curl -s https://releases-rhcos.svc.ci.openshift.org/storage/releases/maipo/builds.json | jq '{latest: .builds[0], timestamp}'
  {
    "latest": "47.246",
    "timestamp": "2019-01-05T23:11:19Z"
  }

I'm going with 47.245, because it's been selected as the likely build
for the next OpenShift release.

Clayton just pushed 4.0.0-0.alpha-2019-01-04-235315 to
quay.io/openshift-release-dev/ocp-release:4.0.0-9.

Renaming OPENSHIFT_INSTALL_RELEASE_IMAGE_OVERRIDE gets us CI testing
of the pinned release despite openshift/release@60007df2 (Use
RELEASE_IMAGE_LATEST for CVO payload, 2018-10-03,
openshift/release#1793).

Also comment out regions which this particular RHCOS build wasn't
pushed to, leaving only:

  $ curl -s https://releases-rhcos.svc.ci.openshift.org/storage/releases/maipo/47.246/meta.json | jq -r '.amis[] | .name'
  ap-northeast-1
  ap-northeast-2
  ap-south-1
  ap-southeast-1
  ap-southeast-2
  ca-central-1
  eu-central-1
  eu-west-1
  eu-west-2
  eu-west-3
  sa-east-1
  us-east-1
  us-east-2
  us-west-1
  us-west-2

I'd initially expected to export the pinning environment variables in
release.sh, but I've put them in build.sh here because our continuous
integration tests use build.sh directly and don't go through
release.sh.
@wking wking force-pushed the version-0.9.0-pins branch from a019730 to b6ee45c Compare January 6, 2019 04:35
Copy link
Contributor

@crawford crawford left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. CI is also green.

@wking wking closed this Jan 6, 2019
@wking wking deleted the version-0.9.0-pins branch January 6, 2019 16:16
@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Jan 6, 2019

Tagged as v0.9.0 last night.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants