Skip to content

STOR-2954: inject centralized TLS configuration for storage operators - #8887

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 4 commits into
openshift:mainfrom
ingvagabund:storage-operators-tls
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

STOR-2954: inject centralized TLS configuration for storage operators#8887
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 4 commits into
openshift:mainfrom
ingvagabund:storage-operators-tls

Conversation

@ingvagabund

@ingvagabund ingvagabund commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

have cloud-storage-operator and csi-snapshot-controller-operator honor the centralized TLS configuration

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • Subject and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been referenced.
  • This change includes docs.
  • This change includes unit tests.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added secure serving certificates for the Cluster Storage and CSI Snapshot Controller operators.
    • Added controller configuration for operator serving endpoints.
    • Operators now automatically load updated configuration and certificate data.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved certificate reconciliation consistency and renewal behavior.
    • Added platform-specific handling to avoid unsupported certificate management.
  • Tests

    • Added coverage validating certificate contents, DNS names, and repeatable reconciliation.

@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pipeline controller notification
This repo is configured to use the pipeline controller. Second-stage tests will be triggered either automatically or after lgtm label is added, depending on the repository configuration. The pipeline controller will automatically detect which contexts are required and will utilize /test Prow commands to trigger the second stage.

For optional jobs, comment /test ? to see a list of all defined jobs. To trigger manually all jobs from second stage use /pipeline required command.

This repository is configured in: LGTM mode

@openshift-ci-robot

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ingvagabund: This pull request references STOR-2954 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

What this PR does / why we need it:

have cloud-storage-operator and csi-snapshot-controller-operator honor the centralized TLS configuration

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes

Special notes for your reviewer:

Checklist:

  • Subject and description added to both, commit and PR.
  • Relevant issues have been referenced.
  • This change includes docs.
  • This change includes unit tests.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 1, 2026
@openshift-ci
openshift-ci Bot requested review from bryan-cox and jparrill July 1, 2026 13:56
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added area/control-plane-operator Indicates the PR includes changes for the control plane operator - in an OCP release and removed do-not-merge/needs-area labels Jul 1, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 59.25926% with 44 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 44.77%. Comparing base (09265ac) to head (d681c26).
⚠️ Report is 133 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
support/config/genericcontrollerconfig.go 72.09% 8 Missing and 4 partials ⚠️
...edcontrolplane/manifests/clusterstorageoperator.go 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
...olplane/manifests/csisnapshotcontrolleroperator.go 0.00% 7 Missing ⚠️
...ostedcontrolplane/hostedcontrolplane_controller.go 53.84% 4 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...tedcontrolplane/v2/snapshotcontroller/component.go 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
...rollers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/storage/component.go 0.00% 5 Missing ⚠️
...ers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/pkioperator/component.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...ostedcontrolplane/v2/registryoperator/component.go 0.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8887      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   44.50%   44.77%   +0.26%     
==========================================
  Files         774      778       +4     
  Lines       96980    97179     +199     
==========================================
+ Hits        43164    43509     +345     
+ Misses      50828    50672     -156     
- Partials     2988     2998      +10     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...hostedcontrolplane/pki/cluster_storage_operator.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
...ntrolplane/pki/csi_snapshot_controller_operator.go 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
support/controlplane-component/common.go 73.68% <100.00%> (+3.98%) ⬆️
support/controlplane-component/generic-adapter.go 74.28% <100.00%> (+23.46%) ⬆️
...ers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/pkioperator/component.go 42.85% <0.00%> (ø)
...ostedcontrolplane/v2/registryoperator/component.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...tedcontrolplane/v2/snapshotcontroller/component.go 39.02% <0.00%> (+26.52%) ⬆️
...rollers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/storage/component.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...ostedcontrolplane/hostedcontrolplane_controller.go 46.06% <53.84%> (+0.03%) ⬆️
...edcontrolplane/manifests/clusterstorageoperator.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
... and 2 more

... and 28 files with indirect coverage changes

Flag Coverage Δ
cmd-support 38.49% <78.94%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
cpo-hostedcontrolplane 47.20% <37.25%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
cpo-other 45.30% <ø> (+0.05%) ⬆️
hypershift-operator 54.63% <ø> (+0.19%) ⬆️
other 34.32% <ø> (+1.68%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ingvagabund
ingvagabund force-pushed the storage-operators-tls branch from 70b9d62 to 063ba79 Compare July 1, 2026 14:20
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Note

Reviews paused

It looks like this branch is under active development. To avoid overwhelming you with review comments due to an influx of new commits, CodeRabbit has automatically paused this review. You can configure this behavior by changing the reviews.auto_review.auto_pause_after_reviewed_commits setting.

Use the following commands to manage reviews:

  • @coderabbitai resume to resume automatic reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a single review.

Use the checkboxes below for quick actions:

  • ▶️ Resume reviews
  • 🔍 Trigger review
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Adds serving configuration ConfigMaps and deployment mounts for the Cluster Storage Operator and CSI Snapshot Controller Operator. Controller configuration generation now uses a shared helper. New serving certificate manifests and PKI reconciliation functions create certificates with operator and localhost DNS names. Certificate reconciliation is enabled except on IBM Cloud and PowerVS platforms, with tests covering certificate fields and idempotence.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  participant HostedControlPlaneReconciler
  participant PKIReconciler
  participant ServingCertSecret
  HostedControlPlaneReconciler->>HostedControlPlaneReconciler: evaluate storage and CSI platform gating
  HostedControlPlaneReconciler->>PKIReconciler: reconcile operator serving certificate
  PKIReconciler->>ServingCertSecret: create or update TLS certificate and key
  ServingCertSecret-->>PKIReconciler: return certificate data
Loading
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 11
✅ Passed checks (11 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title is concise and matches the main change: wiring centralized TLS/config handling into the storage-related operators.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed New tests use static t.Run titles; no Ginkgo titles or dynamic identifiers appear in the added test names.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed PASS: These are plain unit tests, not Ginkgo; they create no cluster resources, use no waits, and follow existing pki test style with explicit failure messages.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed The PR only adds config mounts, cert handling, and helper wiring; no topology-sensitive scheduling constraints were introduced.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No new Ginkgo e2e tests were added; the new tests are plain unit tests and contain no IPv4-only or external-connectivity assumptions.
No-Weak-Crypto ✅ Passed No MD5/SHA1/DES/RC4/3DES/Blowfish/ECB, custom crypto, or secret/token constant-time issues were added; new code delegates to existing cert helpers.
Container-Privileges ✅ Passed Changed manifests keep restricted securityContext and add no privileged/host namespace settings.
No-Sensitive-Data-In-Logs ✅ Passed PASS: The PR adds cert/config wiring only; no new log statements or sensitive values are emitted, and the existing log line is generic.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/snapshotcontroller/deployment.go (1)

41-78: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | ⚡ Quick win

Simplify: set TypeMeta directly instead of JSON→map→YAML roundtrip.

configv1.GenericControllerConfig embeds metav1.TypeMeta inline, so apiVersion/kind can be set as struct fields and the whole config YAML-marshaled directly — no need for the JSON marshal/unmarshal-to-map dance. This also drops the encoding/json import.

This exact function body is duplicated verbatim in storage/deployment.go. Consider extracting a shared helper (e.g. in support/config) that both callers invoke with just the ComponentName/BindAddress, to avoid maintaining two copies of this marshal logic.

♻️ Proposed simplification
-func adaptControllerConfig(cpContext component.WorkloadContext, cm *corev1.ConfigMap) error {
-	profile := cpContext.HCP.Spec.Configuration.GetTLSSecurityProfile()
-	controllerConfig := configv1.GenericControllerConfig{
-		ServingInfo: configv1.HTTPServingInfo{
-			ServingInfo: configv1.ServingInfo{
-				BindAddress:   ":8443",
-				CipherSuites:  config.CipherSuites(profile),
-				MinTLSVersion: config.MinTLSVersion(profile),
-			},
-		},
-	}
-
-	asJSON, err := json.Marshal(controllerConfig)
-	if err != nil {
-		return fmt.Errorf("failed to json marshal config: %w", err)
-	}
-
-	asMap := map[string]any{}
-	if err := json.Unmarshal(asJSON, &asMap); err != nil {
-		return fmt.Errorf("failed to json unmarshal config: %w", err)
-	}
-
-	asMap["apiVersion"] = configv1.GroupVersion.String()
-	asMap["kind"] = "GenericControllerConfig"
-
-	data, err := yaml.Marshal(asMap)
+func adaptControllerConfig(cpContext component.WorkloadContext, cm *corev1.ConfigMap) error {
+	profile := cpContext.HCP.Spec.Configuration.GetTLSSecurityProfile()
+	controllerConfig := configv1.GenericControllerConfig{
+		TypeMeta: metav1.TypeMeta{
+			APIVersion: configv1.GroupVersion.String(),
+			Kind:       "GenericControllerConfig",
+		},
+		ServingInfo: configv1.HTTPServingInfo{
+			ServingInfo: configv1.ServingInfo{
+				BindAddress:   ":8443",
+				CipherSuites:  config.CipherSuites(profile),
+				MinTLSVersion: config.MinTLSVersion(profile),
+			},
+		},
+	}
+
+	data, err := yaml.Marshal(controllerConfig)
	if err != nil {
		return fmt.Errorf("failed to yaml marshal config: %w", err)
	}

I flagged this with `` since it touches the openshift/api `GenericControllerConfig` struct shape; please confirm the embedded `TypeMeta` field name/tag matches what's assumed above.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In
`@control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/snapshotcontroller/deployment.go`
around lines 41 - 78, Simplify adaptControllerConfig by setting
configv1.GenericControllerConfig.TypeMeta directly and YAML-marshaling the
struct instead of converting through JSON and a map. Remove the unnecessary
encoding/json roundtrip, keep the existing TLS profile-derived ServingInfo
setup, and ensure apiVersion/kind are populated via the embedded TypeMeta on
GenericControllerConfig. Since this logic is duplicated in
storage/deployment.go, consider extracting a shared helper so both callers reuse
the same config rendering path.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Nitpick comments:
In
`@control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/snapshotcontroller/deployment.go`:
- Around line 41-78: Simplify adaptControllerConfig by setting
configv1.GenericControllerConfig.TypeMeta directly and YAML-marshaling the
struct instead of converting through JSON and a map. Remove the unnecessary
encoding/json roundtrip, keep the existing TLS profile-derived ServingInfo
setup, and ensure apiVersion/kind are populated via the embedded TypeMeta on
GenericControllerConfig. Since this logic is duplicated in
storage/deployment.go, consider extracting a shared helper so both callers reuse
the same config rendering path.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: af393ddb-20c4-4046-b1ae-8da2c8c37591

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8c71b38 and 063ba79.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (30)
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/assets/cluster-storage-operator/controller-config.yaml
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/assets/cluster-storage-operator/deployment.yaml
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/assets/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/controller-config.yaml
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/assets/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/deployment.yaml
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/snapshotcontroller/component.go
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/snapshotcontroller/deployment.go
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/storage/component.go
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/storage/deployment.go

@ingvagabund

ingvagabund commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Running the CPO image locally:

$ oc logs -n clusters-jchaloup-20260702 csi-snapshot-controller-operator-65778b549d-rkhjh 
...
I0703 10:50:01.324010       1 builder.go:304] csi-snapshot-controller-operator version -
F0703 10:50:01.324180       1 cmd.go:182] bindAddress is invalid: not an IP
$ oc logs -n clusters-jchaloup-20260702 cluster-storage-operator-9db98c6f4-pk2k7
...
I0703 11:13:43.020670       1 builder.go:304] cluster-storage-operator version 4.22.0-202607010254.p2.g8dfdf2e.assembly.stream.el9-8dfdf2e-8dfdf2ef3310358f3559a5481df43b98b2294791
F0703 11:13:43.020784       1 cmd.go:182] bindAddress is invalid: not an IP

@ingvagabund
ingvagabund force-pushed the storage-operators-tls branch from 063ba79 to b12aa98 Compare July 3, 2026 11:47
@ingvagabund

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Validated via #8912 (comment). Both operators are running

@dfajmon

dfajmon commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 3, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test e2e-aks
/test e2e-aws
/test e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator
/test e2e-azure-v2-self-managed
/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced
/test e2e-v2-aws
/test e2e-v2-gke

@cwbotbot

cwbotbot commented Jul 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test Results

e2e-aws

e2e-aks

@hypershift-jira-solve-ci

hypershift-jira-solve-ci Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I now have a complete picture. Here's the analysis:

Test Failure Analysis Complete

Job Information

Test Failure Analysis

Error

[sig-hypershift][Jira:Hypershift][Feature:EtcdResilience] Etcd Chaos
  should recover after a member is removed from the etcd cluster

[FAILED] failed to remove etcd member etcd-0
Unexpected error:
    <exec.CodeExitError>:
    command terminated with exit code 1
    { Err: "command terminated with exit code 1", Code: 1 }

etcdserver: unhealthy cluster
rpc error: code = Unavailable desc = etcdserver: unhealthy cluster

Summary

The job failed due to a single flaky etcd chaos resilience test (should recover after a member is removed from the etcd cluster) that is unrelated to PR #8887. The PR modifies TLS configuration injection for storage operators (cloud-storage-operator, csi-snapshot-controller-operator) and does not touch any etcd code or test code. All 7 other test groups passed (external-oidc, oauth-lb, private, upgrade, autoscaling, public, plus 426 public e2e specs with 0 failures). The etcd cluster was left in a transiently unhealthy state by the preceding data corruption recovery test, and the member removal test ran immediately after (completing in only 0.87s) without waiting for full cluster health — causing the etcdctl member remove RPC to fail with "unhealthy cluster".

Root Cause

The root cause is a test sequencing/timing issue in the etcd chaos test suite, not a product bug or a regression from PR #8887.

Sequence of events:

  1. The 4th etcd chaos test (should recover after a single member's data is corrupted) ran successfully. It destroyed the data directory on etcd-1, triggered an etcd recovery job, and waited 55 seconds for the StatefulSet to converge. This test passed.
  2. The 5th test (should recover after a member is removed from the etcd cluster) started immediately after at 16:17:40.946.
  3. The test successfully found 3 etcd pods and discovered the member ID for etcd-0 (4d27a664a000c50d).
  4. When it attempted etcdctl member remove, the etcd cluster returned rpc error: code = Unavailable desc = etcdserver: unhealthy cluster at 16:17:41.789.
  5. The test failed after only 0.869 seconds of execution.

The etcd cluster was still recovering from the previous test's data corruption and recovery cycle. While the StatefulSet had converged (all pods running), the etcd cluster itself had not fully stabilized — members were still catching up or performing internal consistency checks. The MemberRemove API requires a healthy quorum, which was transiently unavailable.

PR #8887 is not involved: The PR adds TLS configuration for cloud-storage-operator and csi-snapshot-controller-operator via the control plane operator. It does not modify:

  • Any etcd code or configuration
  • The etcd chaos test suite (etcd_chaos_test.go)
  • The etcd operator or StatefulSet management
  • Any test infrastructure or CI step scripts
Recommendations
  1. Retrigger the job — This is a flaky test failure unrelated to the PR changes. A /retest should pass.

  2. File an issue against the etcd chaos test — The EtcdMissingMemberRecoveryTest (line 297 in etcd_chaos_test.go) should add a health check/wait before attempting etcdctl member remove. After the previous data corruption test triggers a recovery job and StatefulSet convergence, the test should verify etcd cluster health (e.g., etcdctl endpoint health) before proceeding with member removal.

  3. The codecov/patch and codecov/project failures are unrelated coverage check failures — they indicate the PR's new code lacks sufficient test coverage but do not represent functional regressions.

Evidence
Evidence Detail
Failed test [sig-hypershift][Jira:Hypershift][Feature:EtcdResilience] Etcd Chaos should recover after a member is removed from the etcd cluster
Error message rpc error: code = Unavailable desc = etcdserver: unhealthy cluster
Test duration 0.869 seconds (failed almost immediately)
Test file /hypershift/test/e2e/v2/tests/etcd_chaos_test.go:297
Previous test should recover after a single member's data is corrupted — PASSED (75.6s), involved etcd recovery job and 55s StatefulSet convergence
Other etcd tests 4 of 5 etcd chaos tests PASSED
Other test groups 6 of 7 groups PASSED (external-oidc, oauth-lb, private, upgrade, autoscaling, public)
Public e2e tests 426 Passed, 0 Failed, 535 Skipped
PR scope TLS configuration for storage operators — no etcd changes
etcd member targeted etcd-0 (ID: 4d27a664a000c50d)
Failure timestamp 2026-07-03T16:17:41.814Z
etcd RPC error timestamp 2026-07-03T16:17:41.789332Z

@bryan-cox bryan-cox left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review: STOR-2954 — Inject centralized TLS configuration for storage operators

Overall the approach is correct — the WithManifestAdapter / WithAdaptFunction wiring follows the established CPOv2 pattern and the deployment changes (volume mounts, --config, --terminate-on-files) are sound. No NodePool config hash impact.

Two blocking items and a few suggestions inline. The core issues are DRY (the adaptControllerConfig function is now copy-pasted 4x across the codebase) and missing unit tests (the existing implementations all have dedicated configmap_test.go covering 6 TLS profile scenarios).

Questions

  1. Are the storage operators consuming --config today? The deployment assets add --config=/var/run/configmaps/config/config.yaml to both operators. Could you note in the PR description which OCP version introduces support for this flag, so reviewers can confirm compatibility?

  2. csi-snapshot-controller-operator has no --terminate-on-files for serving cert (unlike cluster-storage-operator which already has two). Is this intentional because it doesn't mount a serving cert?

cm.Data = map[string]string{}
}

cm.Data["config.yaml"] = string(data)

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[blocking] DRY: adaptControllerConfig is duplicated 4x across the codebase

This function is character-for-character identical to snapshotcontroller/deployment.go, and nearly identical to registryoperator/configmap.go and pkioperator/configmap.go. The only varying parameters across all four copies are BindAddress and BindNetwork.

Consider extracting the shared logic into support/config/, which already owns CipherSuites() and MinTLSVersion():

// support/config/controllerconfig.go
func BuildGenericControllerConfigData(bindAddress, bindNetwork string, profile *configv1.TLSSecurityProfile) (string, error) {
    // marshal/unmarshal/apiVersion/kind pipeline lives here once
}

Each component's adaptControllerConfig becomes a 2-3 line wrapper. If this extraction is out of scope, a TODO comment tracking the debt would be acceptable.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Deduplicated

})

return nil
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[blocking] Missing unit tests for adaptControllerConfig

Both registryoperator/configmap_test.go and pkioperator/configmap_test.go have six test cases covering Intermediate, Modern, Old, Custom, nil-profile, and existing-data-preservation scenarios. This PR adds no unit tests for the new function — the fixture tests only exercise the default TLS profile.

Edge cases like Modern (TLS 1.3, no cipher suites) and Custom (user-specified ciphers) are where regressions hide. Please add configmap_test.go following the pattern in registryoperator/configmap_test.go.

[suggestion] SRP: split into its own configmap.go

Per established convention, registryoperator and pkioperator both place adaptControllerConfig in a dedicated configmap.go, keeping deployment.go focused on Deployment adaptation. Splitting to configmap.go + configmap_test.go would match the convention.

Same applies to snapshotcontroller/deployment.go.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unit tests added, with configmap.go + configmap_test.go pattern

@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[suggestion] Asset ConfigMap should have a meaningful placeholder

The existing assets (control-plane-pki-operator/controller-config.yaml, cluster-image-registry-operator/controller-config.yaml) include a proper GenericControllerConfig placeholder:

data:
  config.yaml: |-
    apiVersion: config.openshift.io/v1
    kind: GenericControllerConfig
    servingInfo:
      bindAddress: 0.0.0.0:8443

This file just has config.yaml: "". The adapt function overwrites it at reconcile time, but a meaningful placeholder serves as documentation and provides a valid fallback if the adapt function were ever skipped. Same applies to csi-snapshot-controller-operator/controller-config.yaml.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

WithManifestAdapter(
"controller-config.yaml",
component.WithAdaptFunction(adaptControllerConfig),
).

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

[praise] Correct CPOv2 wiring

The WithManifestAdapter("controller-config.yaml", component.WithAdaptFunction(adaptControllerConfig)) composition is exactly right and follows the established pattern. Deployment changes (--config, --terminate-on-files, read-only volume mount) are all sound. No NodePool config hash impact.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 7, 2026
@ingvagabund
ingvagabund force-pushed the storage-operators-tls branch from b12aa98 to 85141c5 Compare July 8, 2026 13:23
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the area/hypershift-operator Indicates the PR includes changes for the hypershift operator and API - outside an OCP release label Jul 8, 2026
@ingvagabund

ingvagabund commented Jul 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author
  1. Are the storage operators consuming --config today? The deployment assets add --config=/var/run/configmaps/config/config.yaml to both operators. Could you note in the PR description which OCP version introduces support for this flag, so reviewers can confirm compatibility?
  1. csi-snapshot-controller-operator has no --terminate-on-files for serving cert (unlike cluster-storage-operator which already has two). Is this intentional because it doesn't mount a serving cert?

That depends on each operator. Most of the operators I have encounter set --terminate-on-files on the cert files too. I added the flag for the operator in openshift/cluster-csi-snapshot-controller-operator#276. Yet, if we are to keep setting this flag consistent we should examine all operators and set it for each.

@ingvagabund
ingvagabund force-pushed the storage-operators-tls branch from 85141c5 to 6d9ab1f Compare July 16, 2026 11:00

@jparrill jparrill left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Dropped some comments. Thanks!

Additional note: pkioperator/configmap.go is the only one of the 4 adapters without its own unit test (configmap_test.go doesn't exist). The other 3 all have one. Since pkioperator uses bindNetwork: "tcp4" (the only one that doesn't pass ""), a test would verify that wiring is correct.

Comment thread support/config/cipher_test.go Outdated
Comment thread support/config/cipher_test.go Outdated
@ingvagabund

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

pkioperator/configmap.go is the only one of the 4 adapters without its own unit test (configmap_test.go doesn't exist).

I found https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/blob/main/control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/v2/pkioperator/configmap_test.go. That seems to test the wiring in adaptControllerConfig.

@ingvagabund
ingvagabund force-pushed the storage-operators-tls branch 2 times, most recently from 70a23bd to fd07acf Compare July 29, 2026 10:34

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In
`@control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/hostedcontrolplane_controller.go`:
- Around line 1778-1783: Add unit-test coverage for isStorageAndCSIManaged
covering IBMCloudPlatform and PowerVSPlatform as false, plus a supported
platform as true. Use table-driven cases where appropriate and preserve the
function’s existing platform-gating behavior.

In
`@control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/pki/cluster_storage_operator_test.go`:
- Around line 67-94: Add assertions in the certificate validation blocks for
cluster_storage_operator_test.go:67-94 and
csi_snapshot_controller_operator_test.go:67-94 to verify both client-auth and
server-auth extended key usages are present, matching the reconcilers’
X509UsageClientServerAuth contract. Preserve the existing DNS name, common name,
and organization assertions.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 9015c96a-110c-4f1e-a0fc-c1eecee3ef64

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8686683 and fd07acf.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (33)
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/ModernTLS/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/ModernTLS/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/ModernTLS/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/cluster-storage-operator/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_cluster_storage_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/AROSwift/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/GCP/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/IBMCloud/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/ModernTLS/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/ModernTLS/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/ModernTLS/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_config_configmap.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_controlplanecomponent.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/testdata/csi-snapshot-controller-operator/TechPreviewNoUpgrade/zz_fixture_TestControlPlaneComponents_csi_snapshot_controller_operator_deployment.yaml is excluded by !**/testdata/**
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/hostedcontrolplane_controller.go
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/manifests/clusterstorageoperator.go
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/manifests/csisnapshotcontrolleroperator.go
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/pki/cluster_storage_operator.go
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/pki/cluster_storage_operator_test.go
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/pki/csi_snapshot_controller_operator.go
  • control-plane-operator/controllers/hostedcontrolplane/pki/csi_snapshot_controller_operator_test.go

@ingvagabund
ingvagabund force-pushed the storage-operators-tls branch 4 times, most recently from a99670d to faba69f Compare July 29, 2026 13:51

@bryan-cox bryan-cox left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Second-round review — 2 suggestions, 1 nit. No blocking issues. All prior findings addressed.

Comment thread support/config/genericcontrollerconfig_test.go
).
WithManifestAdapter(
"controller-config.yaml",
component.WithAdaptFunction(component.NewGenericControllerConfigAdapter("0.0.0.0:8443", "")),

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: confirm empty bindNetwork is intentional

Both storage and snapshotcontroller pass "" as bindNetwork, while the pre-existing pkioperator uses "tcp4". The fixture YAML confirms bindNetwork: "" renders. Since these are new TLS configs (not migrations of existing ones), this is likely intentional — just confirming it's a conscious choice rather than an omission.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this is intentional.

Dedup a configmap builder with TLS injected configuration
Mount a configmap with an operator config injected with the HCP TLS security
profile.
…uration

Mount a configmap with an operator config injected with the HCP TLS security
profile.
The newly mounted certificates secrets need to be reconciled
@ingvagabund
ingvagabund force-pushed the storage-operators-tls branch from faba69f to d681c26 Compare July 30, 2026 12:04

@bryan-cox bryan-cox left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bryan-cox, ingvagabund

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 31, 2026
@jsafrane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 31, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Scheduling tests matching the pipeline_run_if_changed or not excluded by pipeline_skip_if_only_changed parameters:
/test e2e-aks
/test e2e-aws
/test e2e-aws-upgrade-hypershift-operator
/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn-reduced
/test e2e-v2-aws
/test e2e-v2-azure-self-managed
/test e2e-v2-gke
/test unit
/test verify

@openshift-ci

openshift-ci Bot commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@ingvagabund: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-v2-self-managed b12aa98 link true /test e2e-azure-v2-self-managed

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jsafrane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest

@jsafrane

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/verified by @jsafrane
In pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-v2-aws artifacts I can see:

/verified by @jsafrane

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Jul 31, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jsafrane: This PR has been marked as verified by @jsafrane.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @jsafrane
In pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-v2-aws artifacts I can see:

/verified by @jsafrane

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@jsafrane: This PR has been marked as verified by @jsafrane.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @jsafrane
In pull-ci-openshift-hypershift-main-e2e-v2-aws artifacts I can see:

/verified by @jsafrane

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot
openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit dc5ea34 into openshift:main Jul 31, 2026
44 checks passed
@ingvagabund
ingvagabund deleted the storage-operators-tls branch August 1, 2026 11:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/control-plane-operator Indicates the PR includes changes for the control plane operator - in an OCP release area/hypershift-operator Indicates the PR includes changes for the hypershift operator and API - outside an OCP release jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants