-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 567
OCPBUGS-20161: Remove unncessary kas port exposure on service #3139
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ func buildHCPRouterContainerMain(image string) func(*corev1.Container) { | |
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func ReconcileRouterService(svc *corev1.Service, kasPort int32, internal, crossZoneLoadBalancingEnabled bool) error { | ||
| func ReconcileRouterService(svc *corev1.Service, internal, crossZoneLoadBalancingEnabled bool) error { | ||
| if svc.Annotations == nil { | ||
| svc.Annotations = map[string]string{} | ||
| } | ||
|
|
@@ -247,25 +247,14 @@ func ReconcileRouterService(svc *corev1.Service, kasPort int32, internal, crossZ | |
| svc.Spec.Type = corev1.ServiceTypeLoadBalancer | ||
| svc.Spec.Selector = hcpRouterLabels() | ||
| foundHTTPS := false | ||
| foundKAS := false | ||
|
|
||
| // TODO (alberto): why this criteria? | ||
| // Introduced here https://github.com/openshift/hypershift/pull/1614/files#diff-62c16653415b8d89921cb26796abc479c31da1654095f7c46b551b470533d66dR368-R372. | ||
| if kasPort == 443 { | ||
| foundKAS = true | ||
| } | ||
| for i, port := range svc.Spec.Ports { | ||
| switch port.Name { | ||
| case "https": | ||
| svc.Spec.Ports[i].Port = 443 | ||
| svc.Spec.Ports[i].TargetPort = intstr.FromString("https") | ||
| svc.Spec.Ports[i].Protocol = corev1.ProtocolTCP | ||
| foundHTTPS = true | ||
| case "kube-apiserver": | ||
| svc.Spec.Ports[i].Port = kasPort | ||
| svc.Spec.Ports[i].TargetPort = intstr.FromString("https") | ||
| svc.Spec.Ports[i].Protocol = corev1.ProtocolTCP | ||
| foundKAS = true | ||
|
Comment on lines
-264
to
-268
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think removing this is correct |
||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| if !foundHTTPS { | ||
|
|
@@ -276,14 +265,7 @@ func ReconcileRouterService(svc *corev1.Service, kasPort int32, internal, crossZ | |
| Protocol: corev1.ProtocolTCP, | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
| if !foundKAS { | ||
| svc.Spec.Ports = append(svc.Spec.Ports, corev1.ServicePort{ | ||
| Name: "kube-apiserver", | ||
| Port: kasPort, | ||
| TargetPort: intstr.FromString("https"), | ||
| Protocol: corev1.ProtocolTCP, | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not familiar with the use-case, but is this so that someone could separate router/KAS traffic onto different ports? If so, this would just be a guard for the ROSA HCP use-case where we use the same port for both. We would then need the
if !foundKasblock further down at line 279There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Might be the original reason, I'm not aware of this use atm.
But also the
if kasPort == 443 {foundKAS = true}is not a valid criteria any more for that potential use case.