OCPBUGS-7840: Untangle kas port - #2964
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: enxebre The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
ec097d1 to
9e511ce
Compare
|
/test e2e-aws |
9e511ce to
24d3a58
Compare
|
/test e2e-aws |
|
/hold |
24d3a58 to
1327ccc
Compare
✅ Deploy Preview for hypershift-docs ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
f37ae81 to
a5c952f
Compare
…ters With this change, existing HCs defaulting Networking.APIServer.Port to 443 will preserve current behaviour of overriding the kas endpoint in the guest cluster. This is to avoid rollouts that would result from changing the haproxy config. New HCs wont default to 443 and they won't override the kas endpoint. Seeting Networking.APIServer.Port to 443 by a consumer is still techincally possible but unrecommended.
a5c952f to
4a5fb87
Compare
/e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn |
|
@enxebre: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7840, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@enxebre: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7840, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiezhao@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
@enxebre: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@enxebre: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7840, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira (jiezhao@redhat.com), skipping review request. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/test e2e-kubevirt-aws-ovn |
|
/hold cancel |
|
@enxebre: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7840: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-7840 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-09-11-201102 |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-09-12-024050 |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.14.0-0.nightly-2023-09-15-101929 |
What this PR does / why we need it:
With this change, existing HCs defaulting Networking.APIServer.Port to 443 will preserve current behaviour of overriding the kas endpoint in the guest cluster.
This is to avoid data plane rollouts that would result from changing the haproxy config.
New HCs wont default to 443 and they won't override the kas endpoint. Setting Networking.APIServer.Port to 443 by a consumer is still techincally possible but unrecommended.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, use
fixes #<issue_number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)format, where issue_number might be a GitHub issue, or a Jira story:Fixes #
Checklist