Skip to content

Conversation

@2uasimojo
Copy link
Member

We've been using cluster-control-plane-machineset-operator (CPMS) utilities to extract failure domains from MachineSets for comparison when matching up generated msets with remote ones. CPMS doesn't support IBMCloud, so we were quietly getting back a generic (empty) failure domain for all IBMCloud msets, resulting in false positive matches and bad controller behavior (namely deleting all but one of the remote MachineSets).

Here we add local code to interpret the Zone from the providerSpec as the failure domain and match on it.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jan 6, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 6, 2026

@2uasimojo: This pull request references HIVE-3002 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

We've been using cluster-control-plane-machineset-operator (CPMS) utilities to extract failure domains from MachineSets for comparison when matching up generated msets with remote ones. CPMS doesn't support IBMCloud, so we were quietly getting back a generic (empty) failure domain for all IBMCloud msets, resulting in false positive matches and bad controller behavior (namely deleting all but one of the remote MachineSets).

Here we add local code to interpret the Zone from the providerSpec as the failure domain and match on it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@2uasimojo
Copy link
Member Author

/hold for QE

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 6, 2026
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dlom and suhanime January 6, 2026 23:24
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 6, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: 2uasimojo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 6, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 44.44444% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 50.42%. Comparing base (26db049) to head (3f207cb).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...g/controller/machinepool/machinepool_controller.go 44.44% 3 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2825      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   50.40%   50.42%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         279      279              
  Lines       34194    34202       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits        17236    17248      +12     
+ Misses      15597    15593       -4     
  Partials     1361     1361              
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...g/controller/machinepool/machinepool_controller.go 64.01% <44.44%> (+0.77%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@huangmingxia
Copy link
Contributor

/test konflux

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 14, 2026

@huangmingxia: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test coverage
/test e2e
/test e2e-azure
/test e2e-gcp
/test e2e-openstack
/test e2e-pool
/test e2e-vsphere
/test images
/test periodic-images
/test security
/test unit
/test verify

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

pull-ci-openshift-hive-master-coverage
pull-ci-openshift-hive-master-e2e
pull-ci-openshift-hive-master-e2e-pool
pull-ci-openshift-hive-master-images
pull-ci-openshift-hive-master-periodic-images
pull-ci-openshift-hive-master-security
pull-ci-openshift-hive-master-unit
pull-ci-openshift-hive-master-verify
Details

In response to this:

/test konflux

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@huangmingxia
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@red-hat-konflux
Copy link
Contributor

Caution

There are some errors in your PipelineRun template.

PipelineRun Error
hive-mce-210-on-pull-request CEL expression evaluation error: expression "event == \"pull_request\"\n&& !body.pull_request.draft\n&& target_branch == \"master\"\n&& !files.all.all(x, x.matches('^docs/|\\\\.md$|^(?:.*/)?(?:\\\\.gitignore|OWNERS|PROJECT|LICENSE)$'))\n" failed to evaluate: no such key: pull_request
hive-mce-211-on-pull-request CEL expression evaluation error: expression "event == \"pull_request\"\n&& !body.pull_request.draft\n&& target_branch == \"master\"\n&& !files.all.all(x, x.matches('^docs/|\\\\.md$|^(?:.*/)?(?:\\\\.gitignore|OWNERS|PROJECT|LICENSE)$'))\n" failed to evaluate: no such key: pull_request
hive-mce-26-on-pull-request CEL expression evaluation error: expression "event == \"pull_request\"\n&& !body.pull_request.draft\n&& target_branch == \"master\"\n&& !files.all.all(x, x.matches('^docs/|\\\\.md$|^(?:.*/)?(?:\\\\.gitignore|OWNERS|PROJECT|LICENSE)$'))\n" failed to evaluate: no such key: pull_request
hive-mce-27-on-pull-request CEL expression evaluation error: expression "event == \"pull_request\"\n&& !body.pull_request.draft\n&& target_branch == \"master\"\n&& !files.all.all(x, x.matches('^docs/|\\\\.md$|^(?:.*/)?(?:\\\\.gitignore|OWNERS|PROJECT|LICENSE)$'))\n" failed to evaluate: no such key: pull_request
hive-mce-28-on-pull-request CEL expression evaluation error: expression "event == \"pull_request\"\n&& !body.pull_request.draft\n&& target_branch == \"master\"\n&& !files.all.all(x, x.matches('^docs/|\\\\.md$|^(?:.*/)?(?:\\\\.gitignore|OWNERS|PROJECT|LICENSE)$'))\n" failed to evaluate: no such key: pull_request
hive-mce-29-on-pull-request CEL expression evaluation error: expression "event == \"pull_request\"\n&& !body.pull_request.draft\n&& target_branch == \"master\"\n&& !files.all.all(x, x.matches('^docs/|\\\\.md$|^(?:.*/)?(?:\\\\.gitignore|OWNERS|PROJECT|LICENSE)$'))\n" failed to evaluate: no such key: pull_request
hive-on-pull-request CEL expression evaluation error: expression "event == \"pull_request\"\n&& !body.pull_request.draft\n&& target_branch == \"master\"\n&& !files.all.all(x, x.matches('^docs/|\\\\.md$|^(?:.*/)?(?:\\\\.gitignore|OWNERS|PROJECT|LICENSE)$'))\n" failed to evaluate: no such key: pull_request

We've been using cluster-control-plane-machineset-operator (CPMS)
utilities to extract failure domains from MachineSets for comparison
when matching up generated msets with remote ones. CPMS doesn't support
IBMCloud, so we were quietly getting back a generic (empty) failure
domain for all IBMCloud msets, resulting in false positive matches and
bad controller behavior (namely deleting all but one of the remote
MachineSets).

Here we add local code to interpret the `Zone` from the providerSpec as
the failure domain and match on it.
@2uasimojo 2uasimojo force-pushed the HIVE-3002/ibmcloud-fd-matching branch from 86596dd to 3f207cb Compare January 19, 2026 16:58
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 19, 2026

@2uasimojo: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security 3f207cb link true /test security

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants