Skip to content

Conversation

@rhrmo
Copy link

@rhrmo rhrmo commented Oct 29, 2025

Cherry pick of #89

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 29, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rhrmo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60108, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.17." or "openshift-4.17.", but it targets "4.21.0" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, POST, but it is Verified instead
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-60108 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.18.0, 4.18.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Cherry pick of #89

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@rhrmo rhrmo marked this pull request as draft October 29, 2025 14:52
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 29, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from jsafrane and tsmetana October 29, 2025 14:54
@rhrmo rhrmo changed the title [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-60108: update log level verbosity to not clutter logs [release-4.17] OCPBUGS-63682: update log level verbosity to not clutter logs Oct 29, 2025
@rhrmo rhrmo marked this pull request as ready for review October 29, 2025 15:15
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rhrmo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63682, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.17." or "openshift-4.17.", but it targets "4.18.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Cherry pick of #89

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 29, 2025
@rhrmo
Copy link
Author

rhrmo commented Oct 29, 2025

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rhrmo: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63682, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.17." or "openshift-4.17.", but it targets "4.18.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from dobsonj and gnufied October 29, 2025 15:15
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 29, 2025

@rhrmo: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jsafrane
Copy link

/lgtm
/approve

@jsafrane
Copy link

/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Oct 30, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 30, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 30, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jsafrane, rhrmo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 30, 2025
@duanwei33
Copy link

/unassign @Phaow @chao007 @radeore

@duanwei33
Copy link

/unassign @Phaow @chao007 @radeore

@duanwei33
Copy link

/Verifie by CI logs

@duanwei33
Copy link

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@duanwei33: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63682, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.17." or "openshift-4.17.", but it targets "4.18.z" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@duanwei33
Copy link

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@duanwei33: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63682, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63324 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63324 targets the "4.18.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.18.0, 4.18.z
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@duanwei33
Copy link

/Verified by CI logs

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Nov 3, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@duanwei33: This PR has been marked as verified by CI logs.

Details

In response to this:

/Verified by CI logs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 3dd2253 into openshift:release-4.17 Nov 3, 2025
10 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rhrmo: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63682
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63682 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Cherry pick of #89

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

Fix included in accepted release 4.17.0-0.nightly-2025-11-03-182249

@rhrmo
Copy link
Author

rhrmo commented Nov 4, 2025

/cherry-pick release-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@rhrmo: new pull request created: #91

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-important Referenced Jira bug's severity is important for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants