Bug 1824935: [release-4.4] Fix console oauthEndpointCAFile setting #407

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-04-02T13:32:36Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #403

/assign benjaminapetersen

Configure the console to use the default-ingress-cert configmap if the configmap exists, or else to use the default CA if the configmap is absent. Before this commit, the operator did exactly the reverse. Fix a comment that falsely stated that the configmap would be absent if the administrator provided a default certificate for every ingress controller. Follow-up to commit 489dfd0. * pkg/console/operator/sync_v400.go: Invert the value of useDefaultCAFile. Fix a comment.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-04-02T13:32:38Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

jhadvig

/retest

benjaminapetersen

/lgtm
/approve

benjaminapetersen · 2020-04-06T18:37:18Z

/retest

e2e-gcp-upgrade - Pod pending timeout.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-04-06T18:37:46Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: benjaminapetersen, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [benjaminapetersen]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2020-04-06T20:02:41Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-04-06T20:15:21Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-04-06T22:25:10Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

jhadvig · 2020-04-07T15:03:43Z

/test e2e-gcp-upgrade

jhadvig · 2020-04-08T07:36:52Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-04-08T07:36:53Z

@jhadvig: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

benjaminapetersen · 2020-04-16T17:02:06Z

@bparees for cherry-pick
This is a legitimate blocker yet.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-04-16T17:10:16Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

bparees · 2020-04-16T17:11:53Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-04-16T17:11:56Z

@bparees: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-04-17T01:01:20Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-04-17T01:01:23Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-04-18T01:01:42Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-04-18T01:03:11Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.4.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-04-24T01:01:28Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-04-24T01:01:31Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.4.z" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-05-12T01:01:22Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-05-12T01:01:25Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-05-13T01:01:59Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-05-13T01:02:02Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-05-14T01:01:09Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-05-14T01:01:11Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-05-15T01:02:09Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-05-15T01:02:12Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-05-16T01:01:31Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-05-16T01:01:33Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-05-17T01:01:34Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-05-17T01:01:37Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-05-18T01:01:30Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-05-18T01:01:34Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-05-19T01:00:58Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-05-19T01:01:01Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-05-20T01:01:30Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-05-20T01:01:32Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-05-27T01:01:19Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-05-27T01:01:23Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1824935, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.4.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.z)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1824934 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
dependent Bugzilla bug 1824934 targets the "4.5.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.5.0, 4.5.z
bug has dependents

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-06-03T11:58:08Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-06-03T12:24:03Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-06-03T13:02:48Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/console-operator#407. Bugzilla bug 1824935 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot assigned benjaminapetersen Apr 2, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Apr 2, 2020

Bug 1824934: Fix console oauthEndpointCAFile setting #403

Merged

openshift-ci-robot requested review from benjaminapetersen and jhadvig April 2, 2020 13:33

jhadvig reviewed Apr 6, 2020

View reviewed changes

benjaminapetersen approved these changes Apr 6, 2020

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 6, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 6, 2020

benjaminapetersen changed the title ~~[release-4.4] Fix console oauthEndpointCAFile setting~~ Bug 1824935: [release-4.4] Fix console oauthEndpointCAFile setting Apr 16, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 16, 2020

bparees added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Apr 16, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Apr 18, 2020

sdodson removed the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label May 14, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 27, 2020

mfojtik added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jun 3, 2020

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 14ef97f into openshift:release-4.4 Jun 3, 2020

Bug 1824935: [release-4.4] Fix console oauthEndpointCAFile setting #407

Bug 1824935: [release-4.4] Fix console oauthEndpointCAFile setting #407

Uh oh!

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Apr 2, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 2, 2020

Uh oh!

jhadvig left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

benjaminapetersen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

benjaminapetersen commented Apr 6, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 6, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Apr 6, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Apr 6, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Apr 6, 2020

Uh oh!

jhadvig commented Apr 7, 2020

Uh oh!

jhadvig commented Apr 8, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 8, 2020

Uh oh!

benjaminapetersen commented Apr 16, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 16, 2020

Uh oh!

bparees commented Apr 16, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 16, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Apr 17, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 17, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Apr 18, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 18, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Apr 24, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Apr 24, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented May 12, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 12, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented May 13, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 13, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented May 14, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 14, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented May 15, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 15, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented May 16, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 16, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented May 17, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 17, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented May 18, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented May 18, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented May 19, 2020

Uh oh!