-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 215
Bug 2081895: lib/resourcebuilder/apiext: Restore check for Established=True CRDs #771
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
openshift-merge-robot
merged 3 commits into
openshift:master
from
wking:restore-CRD-established-check
May 10, 2022
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | ||
| package resourcebuilder | ||
|
|
||
| import ( | ||
| "context" | ||
| "fmt" | ||
|
|
||
| apiextv1 "k8s.io/apiextensions-apiserver/pkg/apis/apiextensions/v1" | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| func (b *builder) checkCustomResourceDefinitionHealth(ctx context.Context, crd *apiextv1.CustomResourceDefinition) error { | ||
| if b.mode == InitializingMode { | ||
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| for _, condition := range crd.Status.Conditions { | ||
| if condition.Type == apiextv1.Established { | ||
| if condition.Status == apiextv1.ConditionTrue { | ||
| return nil | ||
| } | ||
| return fmt.Errorf("CustomResourceDefinition %s Established=%s, %s: %s", crd.Name, condition.Status, condition.Reason, condition.Message) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return fmt.Errorf("CustomResourceDefinition %s does not declare an Established status condition: %v", crd.Name, crd.Status.Conditions) | ||
| } |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So before your change if a resource was
IsCreateOnlythis would have segfault'ed? Seems like a pretty big hole.Should the
nilcheck be in each of the functions instead?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
no, before my change we were passing
typedObjectthrough. That manifest content wasn'tnil, but it didn't have anything useful instatuseither. I'm agnostic aboutnilchecks or panics inside thecheck*Healthfunctions; either way it would be a pretty serious bug to passnilthrough to the health checker, and either way I expect we'll hear about it.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ACK. Did not notice that param change.