Skip to content

Conversation

@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor

@jottofar jottofar commented May 2, 2022

if changed before returning due to a desired update payload load failure.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 2, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 2, 2022

@jottofar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2080429, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.11.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.11.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @jiajliu

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2080429: pkg/cvo/sync_worker.go: Save overrides and capabilities

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from jiajliu May 2, 2022 15:37
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 2, 2022
@jottofar jottofar force-pushed the bug-2080429 branch 2 times, most recently from b552477 to 1a78860 Compare May 5, 2022 17:57
@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor Author

jottofar commented May 5, 2022

/test e2e-agnostic

Copy link
Member

@wking wking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't entirely understand what's going on in the unit test, but the code change looks good to me. Feel free to discuss the unit tests more, or just pull the hold, as you see fit.

/lgtm
/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 5, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 5, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 6, 2022
Copy link
Member

@wking wking left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. and removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels May 6, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 6, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jottofar, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor Author

jottofar commented May 6, 2022

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 7, 2022

@jottofar: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9101174 into openshift:master May 7, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 7, 2022

@jottofar: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2080429 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2080429: pkg/cvo/sync_worker.go: Save overrides and capabilities

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants