[release-4.6] Bug 1890297: openshift-sdn: multitenant: join openshift-etcd-operator to etcd #850

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-10-27T09:15:38Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #844

/assign squeed

It needs to be able to reach etcd, so it needs to be in netns 1. Fixes: bz 1890130

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-27T09:15:46Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered cloning bug for cherrypick for bug 1890130 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

juanluisvaladas · 2020-10-27T11:20:43Z

/lgtm

squeed · 2020-10-27T13:56:55Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-27T13:56:59Z

@squeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1890130, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "4.7.0" instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1890130 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-28T01:00:23Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-28T01:00:26Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1890130, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "4.7.0" instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1890130 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-29T01:00:55Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-29T01:00:58Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1890130, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "4.7.0" instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1890130 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-30T01:00:47Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-30T01:00:51Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1890130, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "4.7.0" instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1890130 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

juanluisvaladas · 2020-10-30T14:44:39Z

/test e2e-aws-sdn-multi
Not a legit failure.

openshift-bot · 2020-10-31T01:04:19Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-10-31T01:04:22Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1890130, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "4.7.0" instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1890130 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-01T01:01:05Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-01T01:01:07Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1890130, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "4.7.0" instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1890130 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-02T01:01:03Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-02T01:01:06Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1890130, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "4.7.0" instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1890130 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-03T01:01:11Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-03T01:01:15Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1890130, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "4.7.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1890130 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-04T01:00:40Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-04T01:00:51Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1890130, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.6.z" release, but it targets "4.7.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is VERIFIED instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1890130 to depend on a bug targeting a release in 4.7.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-09T11:58:01Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-09T12:11:06Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-09T12:37:00Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-09T12:50:02Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-09T13:02:58Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-09T13:29:12Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-09T13:42:01Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-09T14:08:01Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-09T14:34:02Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

jupierce · 2020-11-09T14:55:47Z

/test all

jupierce · 2020-11-09T15:19:22Z

/test images

sdodson · 2020-11-09T16:10:23Z

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

sdodson · 2020-11-09T16:27:00Z

/hold
To stop retests from running continuously. Next patch manager should reach out to author to see if this should be cleared.

sdodson · 2020-11-10T14:47:34Z

/retest

mrunalp · 2020-11-11T21:37:55Z

@squeed can the hold be cleared for this one?

danwinship · 2020-11-11T22:18:00Z

/hold cancel

the hold was because the tests weren't passing, but that's fixed with openshift/origin#25670 having merged

openshift-bot · 2020-11-12T00:39:12Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-12T00:52:11Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-12T04:58:59Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2020-11-12T06:03:59Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci-robot · 2020-11-12T06:23:26Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 1890297 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

squeed · 2020-12-14T16:21:45Z

/cherry-pick release-4.5

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2020-12-14T16:21:56Z

@squeed: new pull request created: #913

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-sdn: multitenant: join openshift-etcd-operator to etcd

ea41283

It needs to be able to reach etcd, so it needs to be in netns 1. Fixes: bz 1890130

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 27, 2020

Bug 1890130: openshift-sdn: multitenant: join openshift-etcd-operator to etcd #844

Merged

openshift-ci-robot assigned squeed Oct 27, 2020

openshift-ci-robot requested review from danwinship and juanluisvaladas October 27, 2020 09:15

openshift-ci-robot assigned juanluisvaladas Oct 27, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 27, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 27, 2020

sdodson removed the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Nov 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 9, 2020

openshift-ci-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 10, 2020

Bug 1890297: [release-4.6] Fix skipping of SDN tests openshift/origin#25670

Merged

openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Nov 11, 2020

mrunalp added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Nov 11, 2020

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9b1a453 into openshift:release-4.6 Nov 12, 2020

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2020

[release-4.5] Bug 1890297: openshift-sdn: multitenant: join openshift-etcd-operator to etcd #913

Closed

[release-4.6] Bug 1890297: openshift-sdn: multitenant: join openshift-etcd-operator to etcd #850

[release-4.6] Bug 1890297: openshift-sdn: multitenant: join openshift-etcd-operator to etcd #850

Uh oh!

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 27, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 27, 2020

Uh oh!

juanluisvaladas commented Oct 27, 2020

Uh oh!

squeed commented Oct 27, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 27, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 28, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 28, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 29, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 29, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 30, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 30, 2020

Uh oh!

juanluisvaladas commented Oct 30, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Oct 31, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 31, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 1, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 1, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 2, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 2, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 3, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 3, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 4, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 4, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

jupierce commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

jupierce commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Nov 9, 2020

Uh oh!

sdodson commented Nov 10, 2020

Uh oh!

mrunalp commented Nov 11, 2020

Uh oh!

danwinship commented Nov 11, 2020

Uh oh!