Skip to content

osdn, ovnk: add publishNotReadyAddresses to metrics services#427

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
squeed:monitoring-add-unready
Dec 19, 2019
Merged

osdn, ovnk: add publishNotReadyAddresses to metrics services#427
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
squeed:monitoring-add-unready

Conversation

@squeed
Copy link
Contributor

@squeed squeed commented Dec 19, 2019

Since these services are just used to configure Prometheus scrape targets, rather than load-balance traffic, we should not remove not-ready addresses from them.

Since these services are just used to configure Prometheus scrape
targets, rather than load-balance traffic, we should not remove
not-ready addresses from them.
@squeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

squeed commented Dec 19, 2019

/test e2e-aws-ovn

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 19, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 19, 2019
@JacobTanenbaum
Copy link
Contributor

\lgtm

@danwinship
Copy link
Contributor

makes sense
/lgtm
did we send any prometheus patches to ovn-kubernetes upstream? if so we should fix this in the upstream daemonsets too

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 19, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danwinship, squeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@squeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

squeed commented Dec 19, 2019

did we send any prometheus patches to ovn-kubernetes upstream? if so we should fix this in the upstream daemonsets too

More or less, yeah. Good point, I'll update.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@squeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

squeed commented Dec 19, 2019

filed ovn-kubernetes/ovn-kubernetes#974

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ea4ea61 into openshift:master Dec 19, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@squeed: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn f9cdcff link /test e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants