Skip to content

Conversation

@damemi
Copy link
Contributor

@damemi damemi commented Nov 6, 2018

As mentioned in openshift/cluster-kube-apiserver-operator#105 (comment), this passes necessary CIDR information available on the bootstrap node to the operator for rendering as part of bootstrap phase startup.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 6, 2018
@damemi
Copy link
Contributor Author

damemi commented Nov 6, 2018

cc @sttts

}
var clusterk8sio clusterv1a1.Cluster
if err := yaml.Unmarshal([]byte(clusterConfigFileData), &clusterk8sio); err != nil {
return err
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add some error context

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Nov 7, 2018

Some nits. Otherwise lgtm 👍

@damemi damemi force-pushed the render-bootstrap-cidrs branch 2 times, most recently from fc1d930 to 786ce58 Compare November 7, 2018 14:46
manifest: *genericrenderoptions.NewManifestOptions("kube-controller-manager", "openshift/origin-hyperkube:latest"),
generic: *genericrenderoptions.NewGenericOptions(),
errOut: errOut,
clusterConfigFile: "/assets/tectonic/99_openshift-cluster-api_cluster.yaml",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

would leave this out actually. Otherwise we keep installer details around here for ages.

@damemi damemi force-pushed the render-bootstrap-cidrs branch 2 times, most recently from 6ef4455 to 2613378 Compare November 7, 2018 15:51
@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Nov 7, 2018

Lgtm.

Now let's get e2e-aws green :)

@damemi
Copy link
Contributor Author

damemi commented Nov 7, 2018

/retest

@damemi damemi force-pushed the render-bootstrap-cidrs branch from 2613378 to d7573c4 Compare November 7, 2018 18:46
@damemi
Copy link
Contributor Author

damemi commented Nov 7, 2018

@sttts all green now, could you give an /lgtm so that we can also get openshift/installer#612 to pass?

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Nov 8, 2018

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 8, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: damemi, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 8, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 24dd18a into openshift:master Nov 8, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants