Skip to content

Conversation

@swghosh
Copy link
Member

@swghosh swghosh commented May 25, 2022

Fixes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2087684

Bump library-go (openshift/library-go#1372) for including following changes:

  • added another suppress func for LatencyProfileObserver that rejects extreme profile transition attempts in case of
    • Default -> LowUpdateSlowReaction
    • LowUpdateSlowReaction -> Default
  • bumped LatencyProfileController with rejection scenarios' check func
    • to update WorkerLatencyProfileDegraded status with rejection related reason, message

This is in favour of cluster stability as mentioned in EP [1][2].

Signed-off-by: Swarup Ghosh [email protected]

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 25, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 25, 2022

@swghosh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2087684, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.11.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.11.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla ([email protected]), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2087684: Reject transition from/to extreme latency profiles (default<->low)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented May 25, 2022

/hold till openshift/library-go#1372 is merged.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 25, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 25, 2022

@swghosh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2087684, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.11.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.11.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla ([email protected]), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2087684: Reject transition from/to extreme latency profiles (default<->low)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@swghosh swghosh force-pushed the bz-2087684 branch 2 times, most recently from c9deef4 to f68580b Compare May 26, 2022 11:18
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 26, 2022
@swghosh swghosh force-pushed the bz-2087684 branch 2 times, most recently from ce8f7b5 to b2616b0 Compare May 26, 2022 12:03
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 26, 2022
@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented May 27, 2022

/test e2e-upgrade

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented May 27, 2022

/assign @atiratree
/cc @soltysh @rphillips

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 27, 2022

@swghosh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2087684, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.11.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.11.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla ([email protected]), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2087684: Reject transition from/to extreme latency profiles (default<->low)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@swghosh swghosh force-pushed the bz-2087684 branch 7 times, most recently from a4056b9 to 30d279e Compare June 3, 2022 11:16
@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Jun 6, 2022

/test e2e-aws

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Jun 16, 2022

/retest

@swghosh swghosh force-pushed the bz-2087684 branch 3 times, most recently from 5f69fc4 to 4293411 Compare June 16, 2022 12:23
@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Jun 16, 2022

/retest

@nee1esh
Copy link

nee1esh commented Jun 17, 2022

/retest-required

@swghosh swghosh force-pushed the bz-2087684 branch 2 times, most recently from 1f76dca to b5a60e1 Compare June 21, 2022 12:31
@swghosh swghosh force-pushed the bz-2087684 branch 2 times, most recently from 1dce27a to e466775 Compare June 22, 2022 13:07
@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Jun 22, 2022

/hold cancel
as openshift/library-go#1372 is merged.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 22, 2022
@atiratree
Copy link
Member

@swghosh could you please split the library changes and the KCMo changes into separate commits?

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Jun 22, 2022

could you please split the library changes and the KCMo changes into separate commits?

Using two separate commits now.

@atiratree
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 22, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 22, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: atiratree, swghosh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 22, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 2 against base HEAD 8876b93 and 8 for PR HEAD 0d17c27 in total

@swghosh
Copy link
Member Author

swghosh commented Jun 22, 2022

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 1 against base HEAD 8876b93 and 7 for PR HEAD 0d17c27 in total

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 23, 2022

@swghosh: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ccm 0d17c27 link false /test e2e-aws-ccm
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ccm-install 0d17c27 link false /test e2e-aws-ccm-install

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 85d20ea into openshift:master Jun 23, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 23, 2022

@swghosh: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2087684 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2087684: Reject transition from/to extreme latency profiles (default<->low)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 23, 2022

@swghosh: Bugzilla bug 2087684 is in an unrecognized state (ON_QA) and will not be moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2087684: Reject transition from/to extreme latency profiles (default<->low)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants