Skip to content

Conversation

@Miciah
Copy link
Contributor

@Miciah Miciah commented Jun 26, 2020

Improve the logging in the DNS controller and DNS provider implementations to improve visibility into the controller's operation and to avoid printing old and possibly misleading status during reconciliation.

  • pkg/dns/aws/dns.go (change):
  • pkg/dns/azure/dns.go (Ensure, Delete): Log the dnsrecord's spec but not its status because the controller only updates the status after ensuring or deleting the dnsrecord. Log the zone along with the dnsrecord's spec.
  • pkg/operator/controller/dns/controller.go (Reconcile): Log when beginning reconciliation. When updating the status, log the updated dnsrecord rather than the old dnsrecord (with the old status), and always log when updating (not only when the update fails).
    (publishRecordToZones): Log when skipping a zone. Log the dnsrecord's spec but not its status because the controller only updates the status after publishRecordToZones returns.

Inspired by trying to diagnose #417 (comment).

Improve the logging in the DNS controller and DNS provider implementations
to improve visibility into the controller's operation and to avoid printing
old and possibly misleading status during reconciliation.

* pkg/dns/aws/dns.go (change):
* pkg/dns/azure/dns.go (Ensure, Delete): Log the dnsrecord's spec but not
its status because the controller only updates the status after ensuring or
deleting the dnsrecord.  Log the zone along with the dnsrecord's spec.
* pkg/operator/controller/dns/controller.go (Reconcile): Log when beginning
reconciliation.  When updating the status, log the updated dnsrecord rather
than the old dnsrecord (with the old status), and always log when updating
(not only when the update fails).
(publishRecordToZones): Log when skipping a zone.  Log the dnsrecord's
spec but not its status because the controller only updates the status
after publishRecordToZones returns.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 26, 2020
@danehans
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 26, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: danehans, Miciah

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants