Skip to content

OCPEDGE-1308: bump(api,k8s) #428

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
openshift-merge-bot merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024
Merged

OCPEDGE-1308: bump(api,k8s) #428

openshift-merge-bot merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2024

Conversation

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Contributor

@eggfoobar eggfoobar commented Oct 31, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Per EP: openshift/enhancements#1674

Bumping ocp/api and k8s deps to pull in the addition of the infrastructure resource for new ControlPlaneTopology enum of HighlyAvailableArbiter.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 31, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from JoelSpeed and deads2k October 31, 2024 14:26
@eggfoobar eggfoobar force-pushed the update-api-dep branch 5 times, most recently from ddb8176 to e29f246 Compare November 5, 2024 02:47
@eggfoobar eggfoobar changed the title WIP: bump(api,k8s) WIP: OCPEDGE-1308: bump(api,k8s) Nov 18, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Nov 18, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 18, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@eggfoobar: This pull request references OCPEDGE-1308 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.18.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@eggfoobar eggfoobar changed the title WIP: OCPEDGE-1308: bump(api,k8s) OCPEDGE-1308: bump(api,k8s) Dec 11, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 11, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 11, 2024 •
edited by openshift-ci bot
Loading

@eggfoobar: This pull request references OCPEDGE-1308 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Per EP: openshift/enhancements#1674

Bumping ocp/api and k8s deps to pull in the addition of the infrastructure resource for new ControlPlaneTopology enum of HighlyAvailableArbiter.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

JoelSpeed commented Dec 12, 2024

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 12, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 12, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: eggfoobar, JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 12, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 12, 2024

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 85cb407 and 2 for PR HEAD 8348acf in total

@suleymanakbas91
Copy link

suleymanakbas91 commented Dec 12, 2024

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@suleymanakbas91
Copy link

suleymanakbas91 commented Dec 12, 2024

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 13, 2024 •
edited
Loading

@eggfoobar: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 8348acf link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 13, 2024

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 85cb407 and 2 for PR HEAD 8348acf in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 3d34fa7 into openshift:master Dec 13, 2024
10 of 11 checks passed
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Dec 13, 2024

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-cluster-config-operator
This PR has been included in build ose-cluster-config-operator-container-v4.19.0-202412130637.p0.g3d34fa7.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@eggfoobar eggfoobar deleted the update-api-dep branch March 5, 2025 05:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@deads2k deads2k Awaiting requested review from deads2k

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed Awaiting requested review from JoelSpeed

Assignees

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@eggfoobar @openshift-ci-robot @JoelSpeed @suleymanakbas91 @openshift-bot