Skip to content

Conversation

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

apricote and others added 17 commits April 12, 2022 11:24
We currently require an explicit project_id field in the clouds.yaml.
This conflicts with the usual fields for Application Credentials, as
they already include a scope, and setting another conflicts with that.

In this commit, we instead save the returned project_id from the initial
auth api call, and pass it around to all services using the Scope
struct.
…dential-support

✨ Support Application Credential auth
…v1alpha5

⚠️ rename v1beta1 to v1alpha5
kubeadm v1.24 removes the deprecated control-plane node label
node-role.kubernetes.io/master. This PR introduces the new label
node-role.kubernetes.io/control-plane in the CAPO tests and bumps
the CAPI dependency for compatibility to nodes provisioned using
kubeadm v1.24.

* bumps CAPI to v1.1.3
* fixes k8s v1.24 compatibility
* fixes periodics conformance ci job
* adds tolerations and usage of the new control-plane node label
* bumps e2e k8s version to v1.23.5
* bumps capo version to v1.23.2

Signed-off-by: Christian Schlotter <[email protected]>
…-link

📖 replace dead link for cloud.conf details
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from EmilienM and stephenfin April 25, 2022 08:32
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 25, 2022

@pierreprinetti: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/unit 53cc87d link false /test unit

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

As discussed with @mdbooth, the result of the unit tests is not reliable.

@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

/hold until the next upstream bump.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 25, 2022
@pierreprinetti
Copy link
Member Author

@mandre @mdbooth would you be OK to release the /hold so that we can merge and test application credentials downstream sooner rather than later?

@mandre
Copy link
Member

mandre commented Apr 27, 2022

@mandre @mdbooth would you be OK to release the /hold so that we can merge and test application credentials downstream sooner rather than later?

I brought this up to Matt this morning and it appears the upstream CAPO release may be delayed a little bit due to late bug discovery. So let's bump MAPO twice, once now, and later to align with a stable release.

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 27, 2022
Copy link
Member

@mandre mandre left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 27, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 27, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mandre

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 27, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 268e159 into openshift:main Apr 27, 2022
@pierreprinetti pierreprinetti deleted the merge_upstream branch April 27, 2022 12:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants