Bug 1878880: re-vendor machine-api-operator at e0db6b65#121

Closed

elmiko wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom

elmiko:mao-update-e0db6b65

Contributor

elmiko commented Sep 22, 2020 •

edited

Loading

This change is being proposed to pick up the recent log message changes as proposed in openshift/machine-api-operator#681

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-low label

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 22, 2020

@elmiko: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1878880, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1878880: re-vendor machine-api-operator at e0db6b65

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug label

openshift-ci-robot requested review from Danil-Grigorev and michaelgugino

September 22, 2020 16:57


          Bug 1878880: re-vendor machine-api-operator at e0db6b65

ee710d4

This change is being proposed to pick up the recent log message changes
as proposed in
openshift/machine-api-operator#681

elmiko force-pushed the mao-update-e0db6b65 branch from ca9b433 to ee710d4 Compare

September 22, 2020 17:55

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 22, 2020

@elmiko: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1878880, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug

bug is open, matching expected state (open)
bug target release (4.6.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.6.0)
bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1878880: re-vendor machine-api-operator at e0db6b65

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

michaelgugino approved these changes

View reviewed changes

Contributor

michaelgugino left a comment

/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot assigned michaelgugino

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm label

Member

enxebre commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest
/approve

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 23, 2020

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: enxebre

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [enxebre]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci-robot added the approved label

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

15 similar comments

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 23, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 24, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

21 similar comments

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 28, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 29, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 29, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 29, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 29, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 29, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 29, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

openshift-bot commented Sep 29, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

Contributor

JoelSpeed commented Sep 29, 2020

/hold

#122 includes the changes from this PR so lets merge that one and then we can close this and mark the bug appropriately

openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold label

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 29, 2020

@elmiko: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp	`ee710d4`	link	`/test e2e-gcp`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Contributor

JoelSpeed commented Oct 2, 2020

/close

The changes from this PR have been merged as part of #122

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 2, 2020

@JoelSpeed: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close

The changes from this PR have been merged as part of #122

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot closed this

Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Oct 2, 2020

@elmiko: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1878880. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1878880: re-vendor machine-api-operator at e0db6b65

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

elmiko deleted the mao-update-e0db6b65 branch

May 19, 2021 19:16

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved bugzilla/severity-low bugzilla/valid-bug do-not-merge/hold lgtm