Skip to content

Bug 1994480: Update dependencies to K8s 1.22#230

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 2 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
JoelSpeed:mao-update-d50698c3
Aug 20, 2021
Merged

Bug 1994480: Update dependencies to K8s 1.22#230
openshift-merge-robot merged 2 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
JoelSpeed:mao-update-d50698c3

Conversation

@JoelSpeed
Copy link

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed commented Aug 20, 2021

We should make sure our dependencies are up to date before the 4.9 code freeze

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@JoelSpeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1994480, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.9.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.9.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1994480: Update dependencies to K8s 1.22

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sunzhaohua2 August 20, 2021 10:50
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@JoelSpeed: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (zhsun@redhat.com) for bug 1994480 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#secondary-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have exceeded a secondary rate limit. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1994480: Update dependencies to K8s 1.22

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

When the HOME directory is unset or is set to /, kubebuilder tries to 
create a cache directory but fails. Make sure in these cases that we set 
it to a temp folder so that the test can create its cache
@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed force-pushed the mao-update-d50698c3 branch from 58281a4 to 8943150 Compare August 20, 2021 11:00
Copy link

@Fedosin Fedosin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

Copy link

@alexander-demicev alexander-demicev left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexander-demichev

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

6 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@JoelSpeed: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure 8943150 link /test e2e-azure

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c689e78 into openshift:master Aug 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2021

@JoelSpeed: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 1994480 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1994480: Update dependencies to K8s 1.22

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

Comments