SPLAT-2220: tests/ote: extend tests for gate AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup by mtulio · Pull Request #129 · openshift/cloud-provider-aws

mtulio · 2026-02-24T22:17:10Z

Changes:

Fix test names including feature gate naming convention
Expanding test coverage satisfying the gate promotion criteria

Previous PR introducing tests: #126
Feature: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPSTRAT-1553 / SPLAT-2220

Tests:

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have NLBSecurityGroupMode with 'Managed value in cloud-config [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should create NLB service with security group attached [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have security groups attached to default ingress controller NLB [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should update security group rules when service is updated [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should cleanup security groups when service is deleted [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have correct security group rules for service ports [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

openshift-ci · 2026-02-24T22:17:15Z

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

mtulio · 2026-02-24T23:08:36Z

/test ?

mtulio · 2026-02-24T23:08:52Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

mtulio · 2026-02-24T23:15:41Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

mtulio · 2026-02-25T00:16:24Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-02-25T00:18:53Z

@mtulio: This pull request references SPLAT-2220 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Changes:

Fix test names including FG name as required by feature promotion

Expanding test coverage satisfying the gate promotion

Test List:

should have NLBSecurityGroupMode with 'Managed value in cloud-config (existing)

should create NLB service with security group attached (existing)

should have security groups attached to default ingress controller NLB (existing)

should keep security groups attached after service update (NEW)

should cleanup security groups when service is deleted (NEW)

should validate NLB with backend pods is reachable (NEW)

should have correct security group rules for service ports (NEW)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-02-25T00:25:46Z

@mtulio: This pull request references SPLAT-2220 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Changes:

Fix test names including FG name as required by feature promotion

Expanding test coverage satisfying the gate promotion

Test List:

should have NLBSecurityGroupMode with 'Managed value in cloud-config (existing)

should create NLB service with security group attached (existing)

should have security groups attached to default ingress controller NLB (existing)

should keep security groups attached after service update (NEW)

should cleanup security groups when service is deleted (NEW)

should validate NLB with backend pods is reachable (NEW)

should have correct security group rules for service ports (NEW)

Previous PR introducing tests: #126
Feature: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPSTRAT-1553 / SPLAT-2220

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

mtulio · 2026-02-25T03:39:44Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

mtulio · 2026-02-25T15:15:37Z

Fixing delete and waiter flow:
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

mtulio · 2026-02-25T15:17:50Z

testing locally:

Run:

{
./aws-cloud-controller-manager-tests-ext run-test \
--names "[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have NLBSecurityGroupMode with 'Managed value in cloud-config [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

./aws-cloud-controller-manager-tests-ext run-test \
--names "[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should create NLB service with security group attached [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

./aws-cloud-controller-manager-tests-ext run-test \
--names "[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have security groups attached to default ingress controller NLB [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" \

./aws-cloud-controller-manager-tests-ext run-test \
--names "[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should keep security groups attached after service update [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

./aws-cloud-controller-manager-tests-ext run-test \
--names "[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should cleanup security groups when service is deleted [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

./aws-cloud-controller-manager-tests-ext run-test \
--names "[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have correct security group rules for service ports [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
} > ./e2e.log

Result: $ jq -c '.[]|[.name, .result]' e2e.log

["[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have NLBSecurityGroupMode with 'Managed value in cloud-config [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]","passed"]
["[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should create NLB service with security group attached [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]","passed"]
["[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have security groups attached to default ingress controller NLB [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]","passed"]
["[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should keep security groups attached after service update [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]","passed"]
["[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should cleanup security groups when service is deleted [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]","passed"]
["[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have correct security group rules for service ports [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]","passed"]

mtulio · 2026-02-25T17:00:26Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

mtulio · 2026-02-25T19:11:49Z

/test ?

mtulio · 2026-02-25T19:12:32Z

/test unit images verify-deps e2e-aws-ovn

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-02-25T19:36:46Z

@mtulio: This pull request references SPLAT-2220 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Changes:

Fix test names including FG name as required by feature promotion

Expanding test coverage satisfying the gate promotion

Previous PR introducing tests: #126
Feature: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPSTRAT-1553 / SPLAT-2220

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-02-25T20:57:17Z

@mtulio: This pull request references SPLAT-2220 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Changes:

Fix test names including FG name as required by feature promotion

Expanding test coverage satisfying the gate promotion

Previous PR introducing tests: #126
Feature: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPSTRAT-1553 / SPLAT-2220

Tests:

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have NLBSecurityGroupMode with 'Managed value in cloud-config [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should create NLB service with security group attached [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have security groups attached to default ingress controller NLB [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should keep security groups attached after service update [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should cleanup security groups when service is deleted [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have correct security group rules for service ports [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

mtulio · 2026-02-25T21:36:32Z

6 tests are passing in the TP job, from junit:

$ opct adm parse-junit junit_e2e__20260225-181544.xml --skip-failed --skip-skipped | grep AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup | wc -l
6

$ opct-devel adm parse-junit junit_e2e__20260225-181544.xml --skip-failed --skip-skipped | grep AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup
[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have correct security group rules for service ports [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should cleanup security groups when service is deleted [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have NLBSecurityGroupMode with 'Managed value in cloud-config [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have security groups attached to default ingress controller NLB [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should keep security groups attached after service update [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should create NLB service with security group attached [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
me@localhost ~/openshift/OCPSTRAT-1553/cloud-provider-aws/tmp (e2e-ote-gate-label-nlb-sg)

mtulio · 2026-02-25T21:36:49Z

/verified by @mtulio #129 (comment)

Update go.mod and vendoring for OTE binary (openshift-only)

mtulio · 2026-02-26T17:02:38Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

tests/aws-cloud-controller-manager-tests-ext/e2e/loadbalancer.go

mtulio · 2026-02-27T01:42:03Z

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

…Group Rename existing openshift e2e tests with feature name convention (OCPFeatureGate), as well adding more tests to cover the gate promotion.

mtulio · 2026-02-27T02:01:11Z

I have also updated the test [cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have correct security group rules for service ports [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]" with following the line of this review.

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

mtulio · 2026-02-27T11:39:10Z

TP Job failed to install, unrelated.

@JoelSpeed would you mind review again, please? Thanks

/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview

openshift-ci · 2026-02-27T14:49:52Z

@mtulio: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-03-02T14:28:59Z

@mtulio: This pull request references SPLAT-2220 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.22.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Changes:

Fix test names including feature gate naming convention

Expanding test coverage satisfying the gate promotion criteria

Previous PR introducing tests: #126
Feature: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPSTRAT-1553 / SPLAT-2220

Tests:

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have NLBSecurityGroupMode with 'Managed value in cloud-config [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should create NLB service with security group attached [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have security groups attached to default ingress controller NLB [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should update security group rules when service is updated [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should cleanup security groups when service is deleted [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have correct security group rules for service ports [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

mtulio · 2026-03-02T14:53:50Z

Validation:

Tests[1] are passing in e2e-aws-ovn job
Tests [1] and [2] are passing in e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview job

--

Test groups:
[1] CCM tests

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e] loadbalancer CLB should be reachable with default configurations [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e] loadbalancer NLB should be reachable with default configurations [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e] loadbalancer NLB should be reachable with target-node-labels [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e] loadbalancer CLB internal should be reachable with hairpinning traffic [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e] loadbalancer NLB internal should be reachable with hairpinning traffic [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e] nodes should set zone-id topology label [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e] nodes should label nodes with topology network info if instance is supported [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

[2] Feature AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup specific tests

"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have NLBSecurityGroupMode with 'Managed value in cloud-config [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should create NLB service with security group attached [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have security groups attached to default ingress controller NLB [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should update security group rules when service is updated [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should cleanup security groups when service is deleted [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"
"[cloud-provider-aws-e2e-openshift] loadbalancer NLB [OCPFeatureGate:AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup] should have correct security group rules for service ports [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]"

mtulio · 2026-03-02T14:54:09Z

/verified by @mtulio #129 (comment)

JoelSpeed · 2026-03-02T14:55:05Z

/lgtm
/approve

openshift-ci · 2026-03-02T14:56:12Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [JoelSpeed]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

mtulio · 2026-03-02T14:57:14Z

/verified by @mtulio #129 (comment)

openshift-ci-robot · 2026-03-02T14:57:26Z

@mtulio: This PR has been marked as verified by @mtulio https://github.com/openshift/cloud-provider-aws/pull/129#issuecomment-3984884802.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @mtulio #129 (comment)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

This change promotes the feature gate AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup from TechPreviewNoUpgrade to Default feature set. The tests covering this feature is added by openshift/cloud-provider-aws#129.

This change promotes the feature gate AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup from TechPreviewNoUpgrade to Default feature set on self-managed. Also the feature AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup is kept TP and DP on Hypershift while the implementation is finished on Hypershift. The tests covering this feature is added by openshift/cloud-provider-aws#129.

openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Feb 24, 2026

mtulio mentioned this pull request Feb 24, 2026

SPLAT-2648: ccm/aws/hypershift: skip unsupported test openshift/release#75211

Merged

mtulio force-pushed the e2e-ote-gate-label-nlb-sg branch from f4d8d01 to 5706aec Compare February 24, 2026 23:15

mtulio force-pushed the e2e-ote-gate-label-nlb-sg branch from 5706aec to 04aaf73 Compare February 25, 2026 00:16

mtulio changed the title ~~DNM: E2e ote gate label nlb sg~~ DNM/SPLAT-2220: tests/ote: expand tests for gate AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup promotion Feb 25, 2026

openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Feb 25, 2026

mtulio force-pushed the e2e-ote-gate-label-nlb-sg branch 2 times, most recently from e4ae260 to ddbfb75 Compare February 25, 2026 00:23

mtulio changed the title ~~DNM/SPLAT-2220: tests/ote: expand tests for gate AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup promotion~~ WIP/SPLAT-2220: tests/ote: expand tests for gate AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurityGroup promotion Feb 25, 2026

mtulio force-pushed the e2e-ote-gate-label-nlb-sg branch 2 times, most recently from 2d2fc64 to f7872e8 Compare February 25, 2026 15:15

mtulio force-pushed the e2e-ote-gate-label-nlb-sg branch from f7872e8 to 7a28fc6 Compare February 25, 2026 16:57

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Feb 25, 2026

UPSTREAM: <carry>: e2e/ote/vendor: updating go.mod for gate

030d989

Update go.mod and vendoring for OTE binary (openshift-only)

mtulio force-pushed the e2e-ote-gate-label-nlb-sg branch from e6ac253 to f4b3797 Compare February 26, 2026 16:59

openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 26, 2026

mtulio force-pushed the e2e-ote-gate-label-nlb-sg branch from f4b3797 to 9e04e96 Compare February 26, 2026 17:01

JoelSpeed reviewed Feb 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

tests/aws-cloud-controller-manager-tests-ext/e2e/loadbalancer.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

mtulio force-pushed the e2e-ote-gate-label-nlb-sg branch from 9e04e96 to 1d636d7 Compare February 27, 2026 01:40

UPSTREAM: <carry>: e2e/ote: new tests for AWSServiceLBNetworkSecurity…

76025dc

…Group Rename existing openshift e2e tests with feature name convention (OCPFeatureGate), as well adding more tests to cover the gate promotion.

mtulio force-pushed the e2e-ote-gate-label-nlb-sg branch from 1d636d7 to 76025dc Compare February 27, 2026 01:58

openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 2, 2026

openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 2, 2026

openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Mar 2, 2026

openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 531f17f into openshift:main Mar 2, 2026
10 checks passed

mtulio deleted the e2e-ote-gate-label-nlb-sg branch March 2, 2026 18:19

mtulio mentioned this pull request Mar 3, 2026

SPLAT-2637: periodic/e2e/ccm/aws: bump TPNU job to collect data for API promotion openshift/release#75615

Merged

Conversation

mtulio commented Feb 24, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 24, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2026 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2026 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2026 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2026 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 26, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 27, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 27, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Feb 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 27, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 2, 2026 • edited by openshift-ci bot Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Mar 2, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

JoelSpeed commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

mtulio commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 2, 2026

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

6 participants

mtulio commented Feb 24, 2026 •

edited

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2026 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2026 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2026 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2026 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

mtulio commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 2, 2026 •

edited by openshift-ci bot

Loading

mtulio commented Mar 2, 2026 •

edited

Loading