OCPCLOUD-3092: Merge https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-aws:master (bea9adf) into main#112
Conversation
Bumps [helm/chart-releaser-action](https://github.com/helm/chart-releaser-action) from 1.6.0 to 1.7.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/helm/chart-releaser-action/releases) - [Commits](helm/chart-releaser-action@v1.6.0...v1.7.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: helm/chart-releaser-action dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
chore(chart): update version
doc/devel: update development guide with e2e information
…actions/helm/chart-releaser-action-1.7.0 Bump helm/chart-releaser-action from 1.6.0 to 1.7.0
|
Hi @cloud-team-rebase-bot[bot]. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
e2e/debug: increase verbosity on test case failures
1feaa5d to
4a9470d
Compare
Update development.md with useful information about monitoring dashboards to investigate CI build issues.
as discussed in the 18 June 2025 office hours meeting for sig cloud provider, we agreed to start adding the sig leads to the owners files. this is being done to help with future maintenance.
add sig cloud provider leads to owners
1.34.0-rc.0 dependencies update
Release 1.34 rc.0
4a9470d to
3d83feb
Compare
Remove potential nil ptr dereferences
Document the new annotation for NLB to handle target group attributes, with examples and restrictions.
Implementing the hairpin connection test cases, and exposing an issue on NLB with internal scheme which fails when the client is trying to access a service loadbalancer which is hosted in the same node. The hairpin connection is caused by the client IP preservation attribute is set to true (default), and the service does not provide an interface to prevent the issue. The e2e is expecting to pass to prevent permanent failures in CI, but it is tracked by an issue kubernetes#1160.
Introduce pre-flight validations adding pre-flight checks for EnsureLoadBalancer with tasks to validate Service object constraints prior making calls to the provider. This aims to prevent changes to the resources when invalid configuration is provided. Currently only NLB target group attributes validations is added as part of this change. feat/tg-attr: support target group attrib annotation on NLB
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: damdo The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@cloud-team-rebase-bot[bot]: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-3092 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@damdo: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-3092 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the task to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@damdo: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-3092 which is a valid jira issue. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/label rebase/manual |
…r image to be consistent with ART for 4.21 Reconciling with https://github.com/openshift/ocp-build-data/tree/4fbe3fab45239dc4be6f5d9d98a0bf36e0274ec9/images/ose-aws-cloud-controller-manager.yml
77642db to
dd8ad24
Compare
|
Added a carry to remove the OWNERS_ALIASES file which was conflicting with our OWNERS carry change. /verified by job |
|
/lgtm |
|
@damdo: This PR has been marked as verified by DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/hold For testing |
|
@cloud-team-rebase-bot[bot]: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/retest |
|
/unhold |
No description provided.