Skip to content

Conversation

@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor

@ricardomaraschini ricardomaraschini commented Nov 22, 2019

  • Updates openshift/api dependency.
  • Generated clientset, informers and listers for imageregistry.
  • Generated clientset, informers and listers for samples.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ricardomaraschini: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1769008, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1769008: Importing new imageregistry types from openshift/api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 22, 2019
@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @adambkaplan @dmage @gabemontero

@dmage
Copy link
Contributor

dmage commented Nov 22, 2019

/assign @deads2k

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ricardomaraschini: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1769008, which is valid.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1769008: Importing new imageregistry types from openshift/api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ricardomaraschini ricardomaraschini changed the title Bug 1769008: Importing new imageregistry types from openshift/api Bug 1769008: Importing new "imageregistry" and "samples" types from openshift/api Nov 22, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@adambkaplan adambkaplan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 22, 2019
@adambkaplan
Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh @sttts shouldn't client-go be updated to use go.mod?

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Nov 25, 2019

@soltysh @sttts shouldn't client-go be updated to use go.mod?

It should if it isn't. Anybody with free cycles?

@ricardomaraschini
Copy link
Contributor Author

ricardomaraschini commented Dec 3, 2019

@sttts @adambkaplan I am working on a separate PR to port this to go mod on
#126

@soltysh
Copy link

soltysh commented Dec 3, 2019

It would be nice to have a set of PRs, api and client-go switched to go.mod

Copy link
Contributor

@adambkaplan adambkaplan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Dec 5, 2019

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adambkaplan, deads2k, ricardomaraschini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 5, 2019
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 9faca51 into openshift:master Dec 5, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@ricardomaraschini: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1769008 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1769008: Importing new "imageregistry" and "samples" types from openshift/api

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants