Skip to content

Conversation

@wking
Copy link
Member

@wking wking commented Oct 26, 2020

Pulled out of #65, since this should green up CI and seems orthogonal to the SDK pivot.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 26, 2020
@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Oct 27, 2020

Install:

Error 400: Service account ci-op-r9q361-openshift-i-9ql9w@openshift-gce-devel-ci.iam.gserviceaccount.com does not exist., badRequest

/retest

@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Oct 27, 2020

/test operator-e2e

@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Oct 27, 2020

e2e:

 level=fatal msg=failed to fetch Cluster: failed to fetch dependency of "Cluster": failed to generate asset "Platform Provisioning Check": metadata.name: Invalid value: "ci-op-rd01z23c-fb094": record api.ci-op-rd01z23c-fb094.origin-ci-int-gce.dev.openshift.com. already exists in DNS Zone (openshift-gce-devel-ci/origin-ci-int-gce-new) and might be in use by another cluster, please remove it to continue
$ oc --context build01 delete project ci-op-nhr8xycy

/retest

@wking
Copy link
Member Author

wking commented Oct 27, 2020

All green :).

/assign @jottofar


// setUp performs test setup.
func setUp() {
if err := routev1.AddToScheme(scheme.Scheme); err != nil {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason you dropped this?

if err := apis.AddToScheme(scheme.Scheme); err != nil {

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, we don't import that yet. We can add it with the commit that adds the import

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But you're just adding back stuff that shouldn't have been removed to begin with. I should have caught it and commented in in the Remove Ginkgp commit so not understanding why this commit doen't just add it all back in.

Copy link
Member Author

@wking wking Oct 27, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We used to add the route scheme (twice?). And out local APIs, which you link. I dunno why we don't actually need the local-API schemes injected, but tests are green, so we must not need them.

@jottofar
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 27, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit bfb6b26 into openshift:master Oct 27, 2020
@wking wking deleted the route-scheme-fix branch October 27, 2020 16:04
PratikMahajan pushed a commit to PratikMahajan/cincinnati-operator that referenced this pull request Mar 17, 2021
raw/metadata.json: add historical metadata from quay
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants