Skip to content

Conversation

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

@sdodson sdodson commented May 9, 2023

This is to work around the series of bugs starting with OCPBUGS-10514 where it takes 10mins per unique outstanding type: PromQL risk to evaluate in versions prior to 4.12.9, 4.11.34, and 4.10.56. If we reduce the number of outstanding PromQL risks by converting them to Always risks when we've had superseding versions with fixes for those risks we can improve the user experience. FWIW, we've not fixed the throttling to warm in a decent time, we've only updated it so that it evaluates risks on the newest versions first under the assumption that the newest version will have the least conditional updates and we can begin offering updates to the best version as quickly as possible while other, older risks, are being evaluated.

All risks modified here have had fixes in superseding versions for no less than six weeks. This gets us back to one outstanding PromQL risk across all channels.

We've done this previously in #2968

This is to work around the series of bugs where it takes 10mins per
`type: PromQL` risk to evaluate in versions prior to 4.12.9, 4.11.34,
and 4.10.56. If we reduce the number of outstanding PromQL risks by
converting them to Always risks when we've had superseding versions
out for quite some time we can improve the user experience.
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 9, 2023

@sdodson: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link
Member

@LalatenduMohanty LalatenduMohanty left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 9, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 9, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: LalatenduMohanty, sdodson

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 9, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c805a26 into openshift:master May 9, 2023
wking added a commit to wking/cincinnati-graph-data that referenced this pull request Aug 16, 2023
To mitigate slow cache warming [1], like 9916190 (Retire some older
conditional edges which required PromQL eval, 2023-05-09, openshift#3590).  The
fixedIn 4.13.4 entered stable-4.13 back in June:

  $ git --no-pager blame channels/stable-4.13.yaml | grep ' 4[.]13[.]4$'
  90eca13 (Automated Stabilization Robot 2023-06-29 08:03:38 +0000 40) - 4.13.4

so it's unlikely that there are all that many folks still interested
in updating to it, instead of a more recent 4.13.z.  And anyone who is
interested can still read the message and ticket, decide whether
they're exposed, and update if they feel they aren't exposed (or if
they feel they are exposed but can handle being bit).

Generated with:

  $ for X in blocked-edges/*PersistentVolumeDiskIDSymlinks*; do CONTENT="$(grep -B100 matchingRules: "${X}"; printf -- '- type: %s\n' Always)"; echo "${CONTENT}" > "${X}"; done

[1]: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OTA-942
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants