Skip to content

Conversation

@vrutkovs
Copy link

It was promoted to the feeder fast-4.7 by 3cdebaf (Merge pull request #1126 from openshift/promote-4.6.47-to-fast-4.7, 2021-10-13) 7 days, 0:08:22.599213 ago.

It was promoted to the feeder fast-4.7 by 3cdebaf (Merge pull request
#1126 from openshift/promote-4.6.47-to-fast-4.7, 2021-10-13) 7 days,
0:08:22.599213 ago.
@vrutkovs vrutkovs added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Oct 20, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 20, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrutkovs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

1 similar comment
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 20, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: vrutkovs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit c8bcaf5 into master Oct 20, 2021
@wking wking deleted the promote-4.6.47-to-stable-4.7 branch October 20, 2021 15:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants