-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
[ART-9923] support dockerfile_fallback field #718
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ART-9923] support dockerfile_fallback field #718
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
7d274b9 to
7cfb9d8
Compare
|
@ashwindasr: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: joepvd The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
test build succeeded, not breaking existing functionality |
|
/unhold |
Alongside openshift-eng/ocp-build-data#5002
Upstream Dockerfiles are sometimes incorrectly named as
.rhel7or.rhel8when their actual contents are rhel9. Added a newdockerfile_fallbackfield in ocp-build-data, so that we can raise upstream PRs without the need for coordinating the PR merge with ocp-build-dataChanges in this PR:
resolve_dockerfile_namein doozerutils.py