Improve analyze-payload scoring precision with three targeted signals - #478
not-stbenjam wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
- Add test-introduction match signal (+40) to rubric: near-certain causation when a PR introduces a test that immediately fails - Add sub-component resolution guidance: score component exclusivity at sub-component level (e.g., control-plane-operator/ vs test/) for repos with 3+ PRs, fixing misidentification in Case 008 - Add cloud platform infrastructure triage with -20 adjustment for platform-specific failures lacking a causal mechanism from PR changes, reducing false positive revert recommendations - Bump ci plugin version to 0.0.40 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: not-stbenjam The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
WalkthroughCI plugin version 0.0.39 is incremented to 0.0.40 across the plugin manifest, marketplace configuration, and data export. The marketplace dependency allowlist is reformatted to multi-line. The candidate scoring rubric for the analyze-payload skill is enhanced with infrastructure-failure triage logic and a new test-introduction-matching signal. ChangesCI Plugin v0.0.40 Release
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Important Pre-merge checks failedPlease resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional. ❌ Failed checks (2 errors)
✅ Passed checks (8 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
openshift-ci
Bot
added
the
needs-ok-to-test
|
Hi @not-stbenjam. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a openshift-eng member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step. Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@plugins/ci/.claude-plugin/plugin.json`:
- Around line 5-7: The plugin manifest's author field is using an object instead
of the required canonical string; update the "author" entry in
plugins/ci/.claude-plugin/plugin.json to be the string
"github.com/openshift-eng" (replace the existing object with that exact string
value) so the plugin manifest matches the contract.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Enterprise
Run ID: 33444abc-f7b9-4dab-b827-756bdd613bed
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.claude-plugin/marketplace.jsondocs/data.jsonplugins/ci/.claude-plugin/plugin.jsonplugins/ci/skills/analyze-payload/SKILL.md
| "author": { | ||
| "name": "openshift" | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Set author to the required canonical value.
The current author object does not match the required plugin manifest contract. It should be a string value: "github.com/openshift-eng".
🔧 Proposed fix
{
"name": "ci",
"description": "Tools for working with OpenShift CI and analyzing Prow job results",
"version": "0.0.40",
- "author": {
- "name": "openshift"
- }
+ "author": "github.com/openshift-eng"
}As per coding guidelines, "Set author field to "github.com/openshift-eng" in plugin.json".
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| "author": { | |
| "name": "openshift" | |
| } | |
| { | |
| "name": "ci", | |
| "description": "Tools for working with OpenShift CI and analyzing Prow job results", | |
| "version": "0.0.40", | |
| "author": "github.com/openshift-eng" | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@plugins/ci/.claude-plugin/plugin.json` around lines 5 - 7, The plugin
manifest's author field is using an object instead of the required canonical
string; update the "author" entry in plugins/ci/.claude-plugin/plugin.json to be
the string "github.com/openshift-eng" (replace the existing object with that
exact string value) so the plugin manifest matches the contract.
2 participants
Summary
Test plan
2026-05-14-opus-4cases) and compare scores🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit
Chores
Documentation