chore(deps): Bump stbenjam/skillsaw from d73ba07234533950979e5b72a62e5ac504fb3f39 to d252498eb6260e197c9c395a650643d9c49ae37b

[dependabot]

Bumps stbenjam/skillsaw from d73ba07234533950979e5b72a62e5ac504fb3f39 to d252498eb6260e197c9c395a650643d9c49ae37b.

Commits

• See full diff in compare view

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated CI/CD workflow action versions to maintain code quality and security standards.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dependabot[bot]
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign prashanth684 for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Two GitHub Actions workflow files update pinned commit SHAs for the stbenjam/skillsaw linting action: lint-plugins.yml updates the main skillsaw action, and lint-review.yml updates the skillsaw review action.

Changes

Skillsaw Action Version Pins

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Plugin lint step pin .github/workflows/lint-plugins.yml	Replaced the uses: stbenjam/skillsaw@<old-sha> pin with a new commit SHA in the "Run skillsaw" step; step name, inputs, and workflow triggers unchanged.
Review comments step pin .github/workflows/lint-review.yml	Updated the uses: stbenjam/skillsaw/review@<old-sha> pin to a new commit SHA for the "Post review comments" step; no other workflow logic or permissions changed.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• openshift-eng/ai-helpers#471: Also updates the stbenjam/skillsaw action commit SHA in lint-plugins.yml.
• openshift-eng/ai-helpers#456: Related migration/updating of stbenjam/skillsaw in lint-plugins.yml.

Suggested labels

approved, lgtm

Suggested reviewers

• Prashanth684
• mrunalp

---

Important

Pre-merge checks failed

Please resolve all errors before merging. Addressing warnings is optional.

❌ Failed checks (1 error)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
No Assumed Git Remote Names	❌ Error	eval-plugins.yml uses hardcoded "origin" in git diff command (line 27) without discovering the remote name first, violating the check requirement.	Replace hardcoded "origin" in eval-plugins.yml line 27 with dynamic remote discovery like validate-plugin-version.yml uses: remote=$(git remote | head -n1) then use $remote instead of "origin".

✅ Passed checks (9 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: bumping the stbenjam/skillsaw dependency to a new commit SHA across the workflow files.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
No Real People Names In Style References	✅ Passed	PR only updates GitHub Actions workflow dependencies (stbenjam/skillsaw commit hashes). No plugin code, documentation, prompts, or style references modified. No real people names referenced.
Git Push Safety Rules	✅ Passed	No git push commands found. PR only updates GitHub Actions workflow action version pins. No force push or pushes to main/master branches present.
No Untrusted Mcp Servers	✅ Passed	PR only updates GitHub Actions workflow files to pin stbenjam/skillsaw (a linting action). No MCP server npm packages or untrusted sources are introduced. Check not applicable.
Ai-Helpers Overlap Detection	✅ Passed	PR only modifies GitHub Actions workflow files, not ai-helpers files. Check scope is plugins//commands/.md, plugins//skills//SKILL.md, or agents/*.md. Not applicable.
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch dependabot/github_actions/stbenjam/skillsaw-84b385d6e986e821769c4f11f685a1fb33749114

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)

.github/workflows/lint-review.yml (1)

17-22: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Add contents: read to job permissions.

actions/checkout needs repository read access, but this job’s permissions block only grants pull-requests: write. With explicit permissions, omitted scopes default to none, so checkout can fail.

Suggested fix

     permissions:
+      contents: read
       pull-requests: write

Based on learnings: when a permissions block exists, unspecified permissions are set to none, so required scopes like contents: read must be explicit.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.github/workflows/lint-review.yml around lines 17 - 22, The job permissions
block only grants pull-requests: write which causes unspecified scopes to
default to none and breaks actions/checkout; update the permissions section to
explicitly include contents: read alongside pull-requests: write so
actions/checkout (uses:
actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd) has repository read
access.

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Outside diff comments:
In @.github/workflows/lint-review.yml:
- Around line 17-22: The job permissions block only grants pull-requests: write
which causes unspecified scopes to default to none and breaks actions/checkout;
update the permissions section to explicitly include contents: read alongside
pull-requests: write so actions/checkout (uses:
actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd) has repository read
access.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: fe2c28fe-6ecd-4d1c-add2-a27ef4d09609

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2550735 and b5838a8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/workflows/lint-plugins.yml
• .github/workflows/lint-review.yml

[openshift-ci]

rebase

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)

.github/workflows/lint-review.yml (1)

17-25: ⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win

Add explicit contents: read to the permissions block.

The job declares permissions at line 17, which means unspecified scopes default to none. Since line 22 uses actions/checkout, the workflow requires read access to repository contents.

Suggested fix

     permissions:
+      contents: read
       pull-requests: write

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In @.github/workflows/lint-review.yml around lines 17 - 25, The workflow's
permissions block currently lists only pull-requests and omits repository
contents access required by the actions/checkout step; update the permissions
block to explicitly include "contents: read" so actions/checkout has necessary
read access. Modify the permissions mapping near the existing "pull-requests:
write" entry to add a "contents: read" key, keeping the existing entries intact
and ensuring the checkout step ("uses: actions/checkout@...") can read
repository contents.

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Outside diff comments:
In @.github/workflows/lint-review.yml:
- Around line 17-25: The workflow's permissions block currently lists only
pull-requests and omits repository contents access required by the
actions/checkout step; update the permissions block to explicitly include
"contents: read" so actions/checkout has necessary read access. Modify the
permissions mapping near the existing "pull-requests: write" entry to add a
"contents: read" key, keeping the existing entries intact and ensuring the
checkout step ("uses: actions/checkout@...") can read repository contents.

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 2b70c857-e982-4f74-ab4c-f81ffb851a88

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b5838a8 and 149a549.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .github/workflows/lint-plugins.yml
• .github/workflows/lint-review.yml

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• .github/workflows/lint-plugins.yml

[openshift-ci]

rebase

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[dependabot]

Looks like stbenjam/skillsaw is up-to-date now, so this is no longer needed.