Skip to content

highlight optional parameters in tool description#131

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift-assisted:masterfrom
zszabo-rh:optional_params
Oct 21, 2025
Merged

highlight optional parameters in tool description#131
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit into
openshift-assisted:masterfrom
zszabo-rh:optional_params

Conversation

@zszabo-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@zszabo-rh zszabo-rh commented Oct 21, 2025

Optional nature of tool arguments must be emphasized in the tool description, otherwise the model might think some of those might be mandatory.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated documentation to clarify available configuration options.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from carbonin and jhernand October 21, 2025 05:49
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 21, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 21, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated the create_cluster function docstring to document optional parameters (ssh_public_key, cpu_architecture, platform) in the narrative description, providing clearer guidance on configurable cluster options.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Update
assisted_service_mcp/src/tools/cluster_tools.py
Updated create_cluster docstring to note optional parameters (ssh_public_key, cpu_architecture, platform) in the function description

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A docstring refined with a gentle touch,
Optional parameters matter so much,
Clear words guide the wanderer's way,
Through ssh keys and cpu arrays,
Platform choices, bright and free—
Documentation helps you see! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The pull request title "highlight optional parameters in tool description" directly corresponds to the main change in the changeset, which updates the create_cluster docstring to emphasize optional parameters (ssh_public_key, cpu_architecture, platform). The title is concise, specific, and clearly communicates the primary objective stated in the PR: to prevent models from interpreting optional arguments as mandatory by making their optional nature explicit in tool descriptions. A teammate reviewing the git history would understand the purpose of this change from the title alone.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6973cd6 and 956461f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • assisted_service_mcp/src/tools/cluster_tools.py (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Red Hat Konflux / assisted-service-mcp-saas-main-on-pull-request
🔇 Additional comments (1)
assisted_service_mcp/src/tools/cluster_tools.py (1)

123-141: Excellent documentation improvement for optional parameters.

The explicit statement "Optional parameters: ssh_public_key, cpu_architecture, platform" at line 129 effectively communicates the optional nature of these arguments. Combined with the existing Field descriptions that hint at optionality (e.g., "Auto-selected based on single_node if not specified", "Valid options: x86_64 (default)") and the diverse examples in lines 131-134, this change should help models understand when these parameters can be safely omitted.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@zszabo-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test eval-test

3 similar comments
@zszabo-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test eval-test

@zszabo-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test eval-test

@zszabo-rh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/test eval-test

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 21, 2025

@zszabo-rh: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/eval-test 956461f link false /test eval-test

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

'none'. For multi-node clusters, platform defaults to 'baremetal' but can be vsphere,
oci, or nutanix. This creates the cluster configuration only; use install_cluster to
start the actual installation.
start the actual installation. Optional parameters: ssh_public_key, cpu_architecture, platform.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe make this a separate section? Similar to Examples and Prerequisites?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also are there no other tools that have optional params?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, this was the only one
that's why I decided not to introduce a new section for this, not that it makes any difference

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 21, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown

openshift-ci Bot commented Oct 21, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: carbonin, zszabo-rh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 21, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit a67cec1 into openshift-assisted:master Oct 21, 2025
14 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants