This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 11, 2023. It is now read-only.
test(e2e/http_ingress): Increase time limit #3729
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: nshankar13 <[email protected]>
snehachhabria
approved these changes
Jul 6, 2021
nojnhuh
approved these changes
Jul 6, 2021
Contributor
Author
|
@Mergifyio backport release-v0.9 |
Contributor
|
Command
|
nshankar13
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 6, 2021
…/pr-3729 test(e2e/http_ingress): Increase time limit (backport #3729)
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: nshankar13 [email protected]
Description: Increase time limit for http ingress test. While testing locally, it sometimes took around 40-50 seconds or so for the request failures to fail expectedly after experiencing a timeout.
Affected area:
Please answer the following questions with yes/no.
Does this change contain code from or inspired by another project?
Is this a breaking change?