Add fix for the tests

[alchemist51]

Description

Fixes the broken gradle post this: #21553

Related Issues

Resolves #[Issue number to be closed when this PR is merged]

Check List

• Functionality includes testing.
• API changes companion pull request created, if applicable.
• Public documentation issue/PR created, if applicable.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

✅ No TODO sections

🔀 No multiple PR themes

⚡ No major issues detected

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Impact
General	Use lenient mocking for MapperService The mocked MapperService only stubs getIndexSettings(). If other methods are called on this mock during engine operations, they will return null or throw exceptions, potentially causing test failures. Consider using lenient() mocking or stubbing additional commonly-used methods. server/src/test/java/org/opensearch/index/engine/DataFormatAwareEngineRecoveryTests.java [278-279] -MapperService mapperService = mock(MapperService.class); +MapperService mapperService = mock(MapperService.class, withSettings().lenient()); when(mapperService.getIndexSettings()).thenReturn(indexSettings); Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that the mock MapperService only stubs getIndexSettings(), which could cause issues if other methods are called. However, without evidence that other methods are actually invoked during tests, this is a preventive measure rather than fixing an actual bug. The use of lenient mocking is a reasonable defensive practice but may not be strictly necessary.	Low

[github-actions]

✅ Gradle check result for c222bf0: SUCCESS

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.45%. Comparing base (5efe7ae) to head (c222bf0).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #21657      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     73.51%   73.45%   -0.06%     
- Complexity    74667    74690      +23     
============================================
  Files          5981     5983       +2     
  Lines        338840   339070     +230     
  Branches      48860    48882      +22     
============================================
- Hits         249084   249076       -8     
- Misses        69890    70143     +253     
+ Partials      19866    19851      -15     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[bharath-techie]

LGTM