[Enhancement] Use HTTP service instead of fetch for plugin check

[RyanL1997]

Description

Use HTTP service instead of fetch for plugin check

Issues Resolved

• Resolve [BUG] SQL Query Workbench Plugin Status Check Failure in Direct Query Datasource #9032

Screenshot

Testing the changes

Changelog

• fix: [Enhancement] Use HTTP service instead of fetch for plugin check [Enhancement] Use HTTP service instead of fetch for plugin check #9052

Check List

• All tests pass
  • yarn test:jest
  • yarn test:jest_integration
• New functionality includes testing.
• New functionality has been documented.
• Update CHANGELOG.md
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

[github-actions]

❌ Empty Changelog Section

The Changelog section in your PR description is empty. Please add a valid changelog entry or entries. If you did add a changelog entry, check to make sure that it was not accidentally included inside the comment block in the Changelog section.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 51.09%. Comparing base (f06a478) to head (1208f40).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...ation_creation/selectors/preview_sql_defintion.tsx	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (f06a478) and HEAD (1208f40). Click for more details.

HEAD has 1 upload less than BASE

Flag	BASE (f06a478)	HEAD (1208f40)
Windows_3	1	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #9052      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   60.86%   51.09%   -9.78%     
==========================================
  Files        3808     3452     -356     
  Lines       91209    81963    -9246     
  Branches    14410    12532    -1878     
==========================================
- Hits        55514    41878   -13636     
- Misses      32154    37792    +5638     
+ Partials     3541     2293    -1248     

Flag	Coverage Δ
Linux_1	29.02% <0.00%> (ø)
Linux_2	56.38% <ø> (ø)
Linux_4	29.01% <0.00%> (ø)
Windows_1	29.03% <0.00%> (ø)
Windows_2	56.34% <ø> (ø)
Windows_3	?
Windows_4	29.01% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

❌ Empty Changelog Section

The Changelog section in your PR description is empty. Please add a valid changelog entry or entries. If you did add a changelog entry, check to make sure that it was not accidentally included inside the comment block in the Changelog section.

[github-actions]

❌ Empty Changelog Section

The Changelog section in your PR description is empty. Please add a valid changelog entry or entries. If you did add a changelog entry, check to make sure that it was not accidentally included inside the comment block in the Changelog section.

[github-actions]

❌ Empty Changelog Section

The Changelog section in your PR description is empty. Please add a valid changelog entry or entries. If you did add a changelog entry, check to make sure that it was not accidentally included inside the comment block in the Changelog section.