fix: handle absent llmMetadata.name when creating secret - #1796
Conversation
Fixes openkaiden#1795 Signed-off-by: Jeff MAURY <jmaury@redhat.com>
|
ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Repository UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📜 Recent review details🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (3)**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
Files:
**/*.spec.{ts,tsx}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
Files:
packages/main/src/**/*.{ts,tsx}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)
Files:
🧠 Learnings (1)📚 Learning: 2026-03-09T08:47:09.657ZApplied to files:
🔇 Additional comments (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR fixes handling of LLM providers that do not set a metadata name, such as OpenShift AI. When ChangesHandle undefined llmMetadataName in secret options
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Tip 💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.
Built for teams:
One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
|
@CodeRabbit full review |
✅ Actions performedFull review triggered. |
Fixes #1795