Skip to content

Define & document a style guide for the foundation's name #280

@eemeli

Description

@eemeli

We should make it clear how we wish the foundation to be referred to. Specifically, it's unclear at least to me whether the short form of the name should be "OpenJSF" or just "OpenJS".

For both the JS Foundation and Node.js Foundation, it was clear they could not use just "JS" or "Node.js" as an identifier, but that's not the case for "OpenJS", which as a term has surprisingly few other active meanings than this foundation.

Now, admittedly the website's domain is openjsf.org, but if that does mean that we prefer "OpenJSF", I think we should make an explicit decision about it.

This is an offshoot of #278, which now has commits and suggestions for both spelling variants.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions