8358731: Remove jdk.internal.access.JavaAWTAccess.java

[prrace]

The fix for JDK-8344235: Revisit SecurityManager usage in java.logging after JEP 486 and JEP 491 integration
removed use of AppContext from java/util/logging/LogManager.java.
That was the only place in the JDK that used jdk.internal.access.JavaAWTAccess.java so it can be removed.

There are 3 tests that use it (digging into internals) but those tests are pointless now that LogManager doesn't use AppContext, so they should be deleted.

Automated client tests and logging tests (JDK tier1 for the latter it seems) all pass.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8358731: Remove jdk.internal.access.JavaAWTAccess.java (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

• Daniel Fuchs (@dfuch - Reviewer)
• Sergey Bylokhov (@mrserb - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25677/head:pull/25677
$ git checkout pull/25677

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25677
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25677/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25677

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25677

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25677.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back prr! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@prrace This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8358731: Remove jdk.internal.access.JavaAWTAccess.java

Reviewed-by: dfuchs, serb

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 2 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• d735255: 8345414: Google CAInterop test failures
• d024f58: 8358809: Improve link to stdin.encoding from java.lang.IO

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@prrace The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• client
• core-libs
• security

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[prrace]

@dfuch please review this.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (fc996bef)

[dfuch]

LGTM

[prrace]

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit eb8ee8b.
Since your change was applied there have been 8 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 2103dc1: 8358452: JNI exception pending in Java_sun_awt_screencast_ScreencastHelper_remoteDesktopKeyImpl of screencast_pipewire.c:1214 (ID: 51119)
• 1c72b35: 8357053: ZGC: Improved utility for ZPageAge
• 52338c9: 8358520: Improve lazy computation in BreakIteratorResourceBundle and related classes
• ... and 5 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/026975a1aa290613934ae421bbc56326627bad8d...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@prrace Pushed as commit eb8ee8b.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.