Skip to content

Conversation

@minborg
Copy link
Contributor

@minborg minborg commented Jun 3, 2025

This PR proposes to simplify lazy computation related to resource bundles. Previously, some objects were computed lazily using a double-checked locking algorithm. StableValues offers a more robust and succinct solution.

This PR passes tier1, tier2, and tier3 on multiple platforms.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8358520: Improve lazy computation in BreakIteratorResourceBundle and related classes (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25630/head:pull/25630
$ git checkout pull/25630

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/25630
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/25630/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 25630

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 25630

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25630.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jun 3, 2025

👋 Welcome back pminborg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 3, 2025

@minborg This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8358520: Improve lazy computation in BreakIteratorResourceBundle and related classes

Reviewed-by: naoto, jlu

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 66 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 3, 2025

@minborg The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • core-libs
  • i18n

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@minborg minborg marked this pull request as ready for review June 5, 2025 13:06
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jun 5, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jun 5, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Member

@naotoj naotoj left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good and clean. Thanks for the refactoring, Per!

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Jun 5, 2025
@justin-curtis-lu
Copy link
Member

Should we consider converting lookup in ParallelListResourceBundle.java to be a stable supplier of the CHM as well? Then separating the creation of the map from the insertion of parallel data.

@naotoj
Copy link
Member

naotoj commented Jun 5, 2025

I am thinking about removing javatime supplementary logic altogether, including ParallelListResourceBundle. Might be good to wait for it

@minborg
Copy link
Contributor Author

minborg commented Jun 9, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 9, 2025

Going to push as commit 52338c9.
Since your change was applied there have been 81 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Jun 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Jun 9, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Jun 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jun 9, 2025

@minborg Pushed as commit 52338c9.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants