Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[freeboxos] Channels are in groups but group is not documented #17074

Closed
lolodomo opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #17279
Closed

[freeboxos] Channels are in groups but group is not documented #17074

lolodomo opened this issue Jul 16, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #17279
Assignees

Comments

@lolodomo
Copy link
Contributor

lolodomo commented Jul 16, 2024

Channels on a revolution thing are defined in groups.
README provides incomplete channel type IDs without the group.

@lolodomo lolodomo added the bug An unexpected problem or unintended behavior of an add-on label Jul 16, 2024
@lolodomo
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am working on a PR to fix that in README.

@clinique clinique assigned lolodomo and unassigned clinique Aug 8, 2024
@lolodomo lolodomo removed the bug An unexpected problem or unintended behavior of an add-on label Aug 10, 2024
lolodomo added a commit to lolodomo/openhab-addons that referenced this issue Aug 17, 2024
digitaldan pushed a commit to digitaldan/openhab-addons that referenced this issue Aug 29, 2024
* [freeboxos] First big update of README

Fixes openhab#17074
Fixes openhab#17077
Fixes openhab#17080

Signed-off-by: Laurent Garnier <[email protected]>
pgfeller pushed a commit to pgfeller/openhab-addons that referenced this issue Sep 29, 2024
* [freeboxos] First big update of README

Fixes openhab#17074
Fixes openhab#17077
Fixes openhab#17080

Signed-off-by: Laurent Garnier <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Patrik Gfeller <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants