Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Don't compile armv7 if the architecture excluded it. #1745

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024
Merged

Don't compile armv7 if the architecture excluded it. #1745

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 18, 2024

Conversation

MAJigsaw77
Copy link
Contributor

Previously only the ndll was excluded from being added to the app, now that part of the compilation won't even happen anymore decreasing the compile time.

Copy link

@mcagabe19 mcagabe19 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hopefully that does better job in ndk r26+

@MAJigsaw77 MAJigsaw77 changed the title Don't compile armv7 if the architecture excluded it. Don't compile armv7 if the architecture excluded it. Jan 16, 2024
@player-03
Copy link
Contributor

Well now there's no guarantee that any architecture will be selected. Maybe we need something like this at the end?

if (architectures.length == 0) architectures.push(Architecture.ARM64);

@MAJigsaw77
Copy link
Contributor Author

Well now there's no guarantee that any architecture will be selected. Maybe we need something like this at the end?

if (architectures.length == 0) architectures.push(Architecture.ARM64);

Right

@MAJigsaw77
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe was better to also warn the user but ok

@player-03
Copy link
Contributor

That would be fine too. I don't have any reasons to prefer either.

@MAJigsaw77
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think is done

@player-03 player-03 merged commit d520fc6 into openfl:develop Jan 18, 2024
12 checks passed
@MAJigsaw77 MAJigsaw77 deleted the patch-1 branch January 18, 2024 19:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants