Skip to content

chore: use releaser app client id#201

Merged
rhamzeh merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/use-releaser-app-client-id
Apr 14, 2026
Merged

chore: use releaser app client id#201
rhamzeh merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/use-releaser-app-client-id

Conversation

@SoulPancake

@SoulPancake SoulPancake commented Apr 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Description

What problem is being solved?

How is it being solved?

What changes are made to solve it?

References

Review Checklist

  • I have clicked on "allow edits by maintainers".
  • I have added documentation for new/changed functionality in this PR or in a PR to openfga.dev [Provide a link to any relevant PRs in the references section above]
  • The correct base branch is being used, if not main
  • I have added tests to validate that the change in functionality is working as expected

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated release workflow configuration to use updated authentication credentials.

@SoulPancake
SoulPancake requested a review from a team as a code owner April 13, 2026 13:05
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 13, 2026 13:05
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Apr 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 8d340d3e-4e7f-4aa4-b3f5-7666d8815668

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 733c4c3 and a4cfc8d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/release-please.yml

Walkthrough

The GitHub Actions release workflow's release job configuration was updated to pass RELEASER_APP_CLIENT_ID instead of RELEASER_APP_ID to the reusable release-please workflow, while maintaining all other secret bindings.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
GitHub Actions Release Workflow
.github/workflows/release-please.yml
Updated secret passed to reusable release-please workflow: replaced RELEASER_APP_ID with RELEASER_APP_CLIENT_ID.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • rhamzeh
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'chore: use releaser app client id' accurately summarizes the main change: replacing RELEASER_APP_ID with RELEASER_APP_CLIENT_ID in the release workflow.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/use-releaser-app-client-id

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates the repository’s release workflow to pass the Releaser GitHub App client ID secret to the shared openfga/sdk-generator release-please reusable workflow.

Changes:

  • Replace the RELEASER_APP_ID secret mapping with RELEASER_APP_CLIENT_ID in the release workflow.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@SoulPancake SoulPancake linked an issue Apr 14, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
1 task
@rhamzeh
rhamzeh added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 14, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 99001f1 Apr 14, 2026
29 checks passed
@rhamzeh
rhamzeh deleted the feat/use-releaser-app-client-id branch April 14, 2026 10:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Feature Request] Automate the nuget package release process

3 participants