Cale/xmodule descriptor studio view - #478
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
👍 |
Contributor
|
Looks good apart from the cosmetic changes requested. |
Contributor
|
👍 |
This just wraps get_html, and ignores javascript and css for now. [LMS-187]
cpennington
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2013
Cale/xmodule descriptor studio view
chrisrossi
pushed a commit
to jazkarta/edx-platform
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 31, 2014
Sequential modx/goto_position hits correct multicourse URL
xavierchan
added a commit
to xavierchan/edx-platform-1
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2019
Feature(GA): Add register and activate event for GA
andrey-canon
pushed a commit
to eduNEXT/edx-platform
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 19, 2021
Updated scorm to 1.0.1 and eox-core to 3.4.0
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@dianakhuang @brianhw @ormsbee: Can you review this as well?