-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
fix: [FC-0092] Fix 500 on return_type is list #36969
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 3 commits
6547cea
ebf08de
e1f8c47
5b66a87
09715ed
bd03bdb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ def filter_discussion_xblocks_from_response(response, course_key): | |
| ] | ||
| # Filtering discussion xblocks keys from blocks | ||
| if isinstance(response.data, ReturnList): | ||
| filtered_blocks = { | ||
| value.get('id'): value | ||
| filtered_blocks = [ | ||
| value | ||
| for value in response.data | ||
| if value.get('type') != 'discussion' | ||
| } | ||
| ] | ||
| else: | ||
| filtered_blocks = { | ||
| key: value | ||
|
|
@@ -41,17 +41,29 @@ def filter_discussion_xblocks_from_response(response, course_key): | |
| } | ||
| # Removing reference of discussion xblocks from unit | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Isn't this comment still relevant as it explains why this is being done?
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Yes, this comment can still be useful, I re-added it. |
||
| # These references needs to be removed because they no longer exist | ||
| for _, block_data in filtered_blocks.items(): | ||
| for key in ['descendants', 'children']: | ||
| descendants = block_data.get(key, []) | ||
| if descendants: | ||
| descendants = [ | ||
| descendant for descendant in descendants | ||
| if descendant not in discussion_xblocks | ||
| ] | ||
| block_data[key] = descendants | ||
| if isinstance(response.data, ReturnList): | ||
| response.data = filtered_blocks | ||
| for block_data in filtered_blocks: | ||
| _put_xblock_descendants(block_data, discussion_xblocks) | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is a very unclear way to update objects in list.
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Made this refactoring |
||
| else: | ||
| for _, block_data in filtered_blocks.items(): | ||
| _put_xblock_descendants(block_data, discussion_xblocks) | ||
|
|
||
| if isinstance(response.data, ReturnList): | ||
| response.data = ReturnList(filtered_blocks, serializer=None) | ||
| else: | ||
| response.data['blocks'] = filtered_blocks | ||
| return response | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| def _put_xblock_descendants(block_data, discussion_xblocks): | ||
| """ | ||
| Put descendants into xblock data if they existed before filtering. | ||
| """ | ||
| for key in ['descendants', 'children']: | ||
| descendants = block_data.get(key, []) | ||
| if descendants: | ||
| descendants = [ | ||
| descendant for descendant in descendants | ||
| if descendant not in discussion_xblocks | ||
| ] | ||
| block_data[key] = descendants | ||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -330,12 +330,14 @@ def list(self, request, hide_access_denials=False): # pylint: disable=arguments | |
|
|
||
| if course_block.get('type') == 'course': | ||
| root = course_block['id'] | ||
| else: | ||
| root = str(course_usage_key) | ||
| else: | ||
| root = response.data['root'] | ||
| course_blocks = response.data['blocks'] | ||
|
|
||
| if not root: | ||
| raise ValueError(f"Unable to find course block in {course_key_string}") | ||
| raise ValidationError(f"Unable to find course block in '{course_key_string}'") | ||
|
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why do we need this change?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Why not use
So, raise |
||
|
|
||
| recurse_mark_complete(root, course_blocks) | ||
| return response | ||
|
|
||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you explain why you are making this change? I understand that the new version will throw an exception, but wanted to understand your thinking.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The change is not needed. Reverted back to avoid confusion.