Remove skip from studio page bok choy test - #11419
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Author
|
jenkins run bokchoy |
cahrens
force-pushed
the
christina/enable-test
branch
from
February 3, 2016 20:47
9f522b8 to
19162fb
Compare
cahrens
changed the title
Contributor
|
👍 |
cahrens
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 3, 2016
Remove skip from studio page bok choy test
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@benpatterson and @jzoldak please review.
While working on a different project, I noticed that this test was skipped. The comment indicated it was because the asset page didn't always load, so given @dianakhuang's recent change, I decided to try removing the skip.
This has passed 41 times. The JIRA ticket referenced doesn't exist, but I did find a couple related to this test where the ticket was closed because nobody had seen the failure in awhile (which perhaps was because it was skipped...).