TNL-4080 Upgrade to MathJax 2.6 - #11412
Closed
Ayub-Khan wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Ayub-Khan
force-pushed
the
ayubkhan/TNL-4080
branch
from
February 3, 2016 14:16
9e8c301 to
cdfc0d6
Compare
Contributor
|
@Ayub-Khan , can you please check to see if this will be an issue: http://mathjax.readthedocs.org/en/latest/output.html#htmlormml-extension-deprecated |
Contributor
Author
|
@adampalay yes it could cause a problem in future. I checked MathJex Configuration files if we need TeX, LaTeX or MathML notations we can also use TeX-AMS-MML_SVG.js instead of TeX-MML-AM_HTMLorMML.js. I tested this locally and got following Result. |
Contributor
|
Yeah, that really doesn't look good. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.

Summary


Because of MathJax, rendering issues were coming in Chrome. Steps to reproduce them are mentioned in TNL-4080 and TNL-4094.
It was mentioned here that those issues are coming because of the MathJex 2.5 and were fixed in MathJex 2.6.
Before Upgrading:
Dot issue:
Vertical Line issue:
After Upgrading:


Dot issue:
Vertical Line issue: