Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: [FC-0072] setup linting on ci/cd #549

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

IvanStepanok
Copy link
Contributor

@IvanStepanok IvanStepanok commented Dec 11, 2024

Integrates SwiftLint more strictly into the project workflow and resolves all existing lint warnings. CI pipeline will now block PRs with SwiftLint warnings to maintain code quality.

Changes

Updated SwiftLint configuration with adjusted rules and limits
Modified CI to reject PRs with SwiftLint warnings
Fixed all existing warnings in codebase

Motivation

Ensures consistent code quality through automated static analysis and enforced coding standards.

Testing

Run SwiftLint locally to verify no warnings
Confirm CI blocks PRs with warnings
Review code changes maintain functionality

@openedx-webhooks
Copy link

Thanks for the pull request, @IvanStepanok!

What's next?

Please work through the following steps to get your changes ready for engineering review:

🔘 Get product approval

If you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.

  • If it does, you'll need to submit a product proposal for your contribution, and have it reviewed by the Product Working Group.
    • This process (including the steps you'll need to take) is documented here.
  • If it doesn't, simply proceed with the next step.

🔘 Provide context

To help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:

  • Dependencies

    This PR must be merged before / after / at the same time as ...

  • Blockers

    This PR is waiting for OEP-1234 to be accepted.

  • Timeline information

    This PR must be merged by XX date because ...

  • Partner information

    This is for a course on edx.org.

  • Supporting documentation
  • Relevant Open edX discussion forum threads

🔘 Get a green build

If one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green.

🔘 Let us know that your PR is ready for review:

Who will review my changes?

This repository is currently maintained by @openedx/openedx-mobile-maintainers. Tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for review.

Where can I find more information?

If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources:

When can I expect my changes to be merged?

Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible.

However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:

  • The size and impact of the changes that it introduces
  • The need for product review
  • Maintenance status of the parent repository

💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

@openedx-webhooks openedx-webhooks added the open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U label Dec 11, 2024
@github-advanced-security
Copy link

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

@IvanStepanok IvanStepanok force-pushed the feat/setup_linting_on_ci branch from 9ac9080 to d43620f Compare December 11, 2024 11:39
@IvanStepanok IvanStepanok force-pushed the feat/setup_linting_on_ci branch 3 times, most recently from 48723c6 to 4cbed7c Compare December 11, 2024 13:49
@IvanStepanok IvanStepanok force-pushed the feat/setup_linting_on_ci branch from 4cbed7c to a3a9dac Compare December 11, 2024 13:50
@IvanStepanok IvanStepanok changed the title feat: setup linting on ci/cd feat: [FC-0072] setup linting on ci/cd Dec 11, 2024
@IvanStepanok IvanStepanok requested review from volodymyr-chekyrta and rnr and removed request for volodymyr-chekyrta December 11, 2024 13:54
Copy link
Contributor

@volodymyr-chekyrta volodymyr-chekyrta left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 👍

viewModel.config.ssoButtonTitle[languageCode] as! String,
action: {
viewModel.router
.showSSOWebBrowser(title: CoreLocalization.SignIn.logInBtn)
})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Curly bracket should have own line and indentation

Comment on lines 222 to 224
},
color: .white,
textColor: Theme.Colors.accentColor,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fix indentations here please

get {
return type == .webview && webview.baseURL != nil
}
return type == .webview && webview.baseURL != nil
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

return is redundant here

@@ -38,6 +38,18 @@ public extension DataLayer {
}
}

public extension DataLayer.CourseMedia {
var domain: CourseMedia {
return CourseMedia(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

return is redundant here

import Core
import Theme

struct StyleBlock: View {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe we need to be more specific in naming here - not just StyleBlock, but somehow related to Course Date? WDYT?

connectivity: r.resolve(ConnectivityProtocol.self)!,
playerHolder: holder
)
})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks like the closing bracket should have its own line here

@mphilbrick211 mphilbrick211 added the FC Relates to an Axim Funded Contribution project label Dec 11, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Please upload report for BASE (develop@17f9376). Learn more about missing BASE report.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##             develop   #549   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage           ?      0           
========================================
  Files              ?      0           
  Lines              ?      0           
  Branches           ?      0           
========================================
  Hits               ?      0           
  Misses             ?      0           
  Partials           ?      0           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
FC Relates to an Axim Funded Contribution project open-source-contribution PR author is not from Axim or 2U
Projects
Status: In Eng Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants